Yeah, the nazis and their defenders will always come out of the woodwork any time someone points out the (easily verifiable) facts regarding who really won WWII (the Soviet Union) and defeated the axis powers.
And you're a fuckin' clown.
Massive eyeroll
Blocking serves no purpose unless it's against people attached to their screenames. The sad person you're referencing and defending was a chronically-rules-violating and banned drama hound and it's good that their permanent site-wide ban finally stuck. If you are that person then, 
If you aren't, then you're stanning for someone that the mods of this site repeatedly found to be in violation of this site's code, they were a liberal shitbag in marxist sheep's clothing, and if you can't see that (fortunately the mods did) then that doesn't reflect well on you.
Anyway, yes, feel free to block this account too, and any of the other dozens I and everyone makes. You will still be reading the things I say on other accounts and not know it. It sucks, but it's simply how this works. Like, I would love it if the person you are or are cringingly stanning could no longer influence hexbear at all, but all they have to do is make yet another alt, just as they have before to evade their many justified bans.
Have a nice time
Yes, I am having a nice time. Are you though? Stanning banned users is far more "unseemly" than "starting an argument" which I wasn't doing.
And yes, I will reply. Like I said, you can block this account, but I'm laughing silently while you actually praise me on my other account! It's rather funny that you adore me on one account, but block me on another. That's something to consider when you talk about making the internet "better" by not interacting with "nuisances."
Anyway, you are still a highly sus new account.
wrongshway erB
Is that some kind of pig-latin or code that we're supposed to "read into"? or is one of us having a stroke?
you’ve become conditioned to parrot the party line and be rewarded for it, no matter how disconnected from reality it becomes.
Pretty rich coming from someone who parrots the US State Department's line on every AES country and every successful revolution.
you need that dopamine hit of the collective praising you for owning the anarkiddies
Right, yeah, that's sure what happens all the time on an instance where people get banned for being anti-anarchist, anti-anarchist sentiment will get a comment removed, and where a good number of the users, even some mods and "power users" are themselves openly anarchist. Yet you run a "community" that bans anyone and everyone with the slightest hint of support for those ebil AuThOrItArIaN socialist countries, and constantly post threads about how dumb and mean those theory-reading "tankies" are. Projection much?
Using language to refer to other people is one of the evil, oppressive outcomes of civilization. Just like being able to feed people beyond a few hunter-gatherers is evil and oppressive. All of this must be eradicated. Don't you know, that's what it means to be liberated?
That word is internet slang, moron. It doesn't need to be tightly defined like it's scientific nomenclature. Even if it did, the way it's being used by the person talking to you is perfectly fine and understandable.
But I'm not surprised this is what you're getting hung up on because it's clear you have no idea what context is. You have demonstrated you are completely ignorant of the importance of historical and geopolitical context in general, and completely ignorant of the specific historical and geopolitical context of the Middle East. And now with your "hurr durr that's not what 'simping' means!!1!" deflection, you're showing you also don't understand the fundamental importance of context in language. It's no wonder you can't see anything beyond lines on a map.
Then why are you the one with mod removed comments and the one getting upvote ratioed? @booty is actually making sense.
Any person who thinks China is imperialist either A) Doesn't know what imperialism is, B) Believes silly lies about China that are easily and readily proven false, or C) Are themselves the ones spreading those lies for ideological reasons.