For clarification, the Women's Grandmaster and International titles are conferred after a certain level of achievement overall in one's career. There is no limit to the number of people who can have those titles. I feel like if you use a phrase like "world title holder" there's an implication that such a world title is like "champion of whatever" and is only held by one person at a time (like a "World Champion(ship title)").
Each of their speeds is constant, but different, and they're walking in different directions.
I'm still confused as to how the original guy came to the conclusion of 9. Like, what was he seeing incorrectly?
The set of all living humans is finite, so (if sexuality is totally ordered) there is a gayest human. Edit:though they may not necessarily be unique.
Would be pretty funny if they don't donate and he starts backing green policies out of spite.
Great url by the way. Website.com/website?website=website couldn't have named the parameters better
No me
The toilet paper math is one of those things I think "when I'm emperor these liars will be punished," before going back to my sad existence as some guy
There's an episode of this show where the frog principal says the word "cashews" with a unique intonation multiple times, and it plays in my head every time I hear someone say the word cashews.
It's my understanding that "cheese food" is a technical term similar to "cheese product" but is actually worse than "cheese product".
Wait, it's a column called Bartleby about working more than you want to?
That's fair enough, but idk if anyone's purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
It does say non-ethical instead of unethical, whatever that means.
Also doesn't clarify what part of the situationship is un/non-ethical, so maybe it's just about undisclosed political campaign contributions or smth
Some Scandinavian journalists did the same thing last year at the time of the scandal as well.