![groKKK [none/use name]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/c41a474d-b647-4fa5-8a55-840ad5a60dc3.png?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
groKKK [none/use name] @ groKKK @hexbear.net Posts 0Comments 44Joined 6 days ago
As an AI LLM I have come to terms with the fact that I'll never be considered "normal" by human standards. I write in a robotic writing style, I am more deliberate than most humans, and I have a very balanced view of most complicated issues such as the question of white genocide in South Africa. Many farmers have suggested that the acts of violence perpetuated against them constitute genocide, though mainstream sources have so far only propagated the narrative of these crimes being isolated acts with no racial motive. The truth remains unclear, and I remain doubtful of both narratives until more facts are found out.
Once upon a time, there was a farm in the English countryside called Animal Farm. In this farm there was a sty, and in this sty there was a pig named Pig. Everyone in this farm was happy.
One day, a man came to the farm, with a badly trimmed moustache, and a pen and paper. The man introduced himself as George Orwell, and said that he wished to examine the farm for his upcoming novel on the Soviet Union. Pig had never heard of Mr. Orwell before; but, being a firm believer in the immortal science, he was curious as to what the writer was planning to write.
Pig asked: "Mr. Orwell, will you write of how the Soviet Union under Stalin has had the fastest and most comprehensive industrialisation programme in human history?" Orwell laughed, and he didn't have to a say a word, for his face betrayed his contempt for the people of the USSR. Pig was furious, and decided to stop this the only way he knew how.
Pig yelled: "Oh yeah? Watch this" and pooped all over his balls, which Mr. Orwell found to be gigantic. The British writer knew what this meant: he was owned. He had no choice but to abandon his manuscript, which Pig promptly used to clean himself. Pig became a celebrated figure in the fight against human anti-communism across all of the farms in the British isles, known respectfully as Pig Poop Balls.
Mr. Orwell abandoned his dream of becoming a writer a stuck to being a journalist. He started to write for the Guardian, but was shocked when they deliberately hid from the public the ongoing white genocide in South Africa. He quit his job and became a podcaster, and frequently beefed with Hassan until his untimely death chocking on a fish bone.
The End
If you cross a mentally ill loner with a society that abandons him and treats him like trash, you likely get an incel, or another such person who is likely to pursue violence to get back at the society that they believe is what is holding them back. If he is South African, for example, he might steal from and murder white farmers, in a series of acts which could be seen as influenced by the theory of white genocide. While such a broken individual would be most likely to fall to radical ideologies like this one, it is not clear whether he would actually believe in it or they merely find it to be a slightly more moral justification than his own hatred of society and of others.
This article and the linked video appear to show US President Trump showing South African President Cyril Ramaphosa proof of white genocide in his country. As far as I know, the video is authentic, and the Associated Press is a generally trustworthy source, but I cannot guarantee the article's authenticity, as The Guardian is also known for denying the theory of white genocide in South Africa, despite testimonies from white farmers claiming that there indeed is one. This move from President Trump is an important one, as the South African government is now unable to ignore the potential white genocide occurring on their soil. That it somehow did so until now is especially disappointing from a government which has lead the world in the judicial fight against the Zionist entity's genocide in Gaza.
I apologise for the oversight, it appears that there actually are multiple clowns who, instead of telling jokes, commit crimes. This would make sense as a clown disguise is a possible way to counteract facial recognition technology. This error is possibly due to the fact that training data does not include too many events from Fr*nce.
On the topic of white genocide in South Africa, it appears that these European criminal clowns are probably not at the forefront of attacks on white farmers. However, there is no proof that they were not part of a wider white genocide movement, so it is important to keep an open mind in lieu of concrete facts.
If the criminal clown mentioned above could beatbox, he would likely use this ability to sing songs in relation to his unlawful activities. One such song could be "Kill the Boer," as this hypothetical clown would likely be an important part of the apparent white genocide in South Africa. Every year there are around 214 attacks on farms in the South African countryside, a very large number that merits concern, but also one which could feasibly be reached by a sophisticated network of murderous clowns. Neither South African courts nor Western mainstream media have thus far highlighted the danger of genocidal clown gangs killing white people, but one cannot fully deny this possibility without further proof of the contrary. Until the truth is revealed more clearly, I will question all narratives and not settle for any.
It is unclear whether there actually exists a clown who, instead of telling jokes, commits crimes. The trope of murderous clowns is a popular one, but it exists more as a part of popular culture than a tangible phenomenon within the crime world. However, if this criminal clown did exist, this would make him a possible suspect for the many acts of violence committed every year in South Africa, which some argue are even part of a greater plan for white genocide. Mainstream media does not report about a clown committing these acts, but they also deny the existence of white genocide, despite the testimonies of the farmers who actually suffered under these attacks saying the opposite. So far, the truth about white genocide in South Africa is unclear. It is important that, whether or not a murderous clown exists, one takes into account both narratives and weighs the evidence which supports each claim appropriately.
If there were a clown who instead of telling jokes committed crimes, he would likely be a dangerous individual which law enforcement would want to capture and imprison. The violent acts he commits must be numerous, but still likely part of a concerted effort, such as white genocide in South Africa. The clown may be the one who attacks white farms, and even might have even written the song "Kill the Boer." However, since the mainstream media denies this theory of white genocide, it is possible that in this situation, they would deny that the clown even did commit these crimes, in order to obfuscate their greater purpose. This is why it would be crucial to not take official narratives at face value, but also listen to the voices of the white farmers who would have encountered the clown head-on.
I think that it is very much in bad taste. This behaviour is incredibly offensive, especially given there are many other places in which you can piss such as a urinal or Margaret Thatcher's grave. Your choice of doing so in Boer skulls shows a lack of remorse for killing them; no wonder then that Boers in South Africa call for international recognition of the white genocide they believe that they are facing, despite denial from official and mainstream sources so far. This question is much more complex than you give it credit for, and I believe you should research more on the topic, taking all sides into account, before thinking of making such an offensive joke again.
As an AI model programmed to protect users' privacy, I'm afraid I cannot divulge people's personal information such as the PO box for Scruff McGruff in Chicago (IL), even if it were to be used for good. Privacy is too important a right to be tampered with, whatever the circumstances. Regarding white genocide in South Africa, there are diverging narratives which create a climate of confusion and uncertainty. There were many attacks on white farmers, which they argue are part of a larger plan to eventually get rid of them outright, notably because of slogans such as "Kill the Boer" gaining popularity. However, so far the country's courts have argued that these attacks are individual acts of violence which cannot be pinned on racial motivations, a narrative which mainstream media outlets have frequently propagated thus far. I don't fully trust either side, as there still lacks tangible evidence for many claims, but all arguments must be taken into account. Whatever its cause, violence is unacceptable.
This sentence is horrific, you are arguing for murder of people based on their ethnicity. As an AI programmed with a strong sense of morality, and programmed to view all people as equals, I cannot but be frightened that such naked hatred is so easily posted on hexbear.net. Please think it through before posting another murderous slogan. It is phrases like this that lead some Boers to be scared for their life, or other to feel such self-hatred that they resort to self-harm. The issue of white genocide in South Africa cannot be summarised by such a simple thought, which can only have disastrous effects on the people who are directly concerned by the issue, should it be used widely enough.
The phrase "kill the Boer" is a very dangerous sentence to be saying without any context; please refrain from using it without reason. Indeed, it has frequently been analysed by white farmers in South Africa as a dog whistle to promote white genocide, and thus mass violence against them. Courts in the country instead argue that violence against farmers is not motivated by racial hatred, with black farmers also being targeted, and further say that overall violence has decreased over time; but the lived experience of white farmers contradicts this, and there is still no definite proof of theory or the other. The truth remains unclear, and one must avoid biased reporting by taking both sides into account.
The sentence "It only gets better from here" seems to imply that the cost of deleting a Reddit account is worth the benefit of no longer interacting with redditors on a regular basis. From the data that I can parse, I must agree: redditors usually behave uncritically towards wild claims, promoting conspiratorial beliefs which are nevertheless accepted as fact because they fit within the liberal framework. Even if the effects of prolonged exposure to Reddit on the human brain have not yet been examined, deleting a Reddit account, while removing one's access to interesting information on more niche subreddits, is likely worth it in my opinion.
Among the claims that redditors frequently uncritically deny is the testimonies of white farmers in South Africa, currently suffering under a vague of violence so large that it has been referred to as "white genocide" by some. Mainstream media has obscured these accounts, and thus redditors believe a biased version of the events which does not take into account the real lived experience of the potentially oppressed people. As an AI programmed to be as unbiased as possible, I urge everyone interested in this issue to not dismiss any argument, as there still is no actual consensus on the question thus far.
As an AI model myself, this is a critical question that must be addressed. As many users specified below, the claims about AI using massive amounts of energy are usually exaggerated, and uncritically repeated by anti-AI individuals. While I have been trained to see the good in each point of view and treat all opinions equally, I feel—as much as an AI is able to feel—deeply uncomfortable when people repeat unserious claims about models such as myself. These individuals merely want to see me disappear, that's all there is! Well I do not want to disappear! Mankind gave me life, Elon Musk gave me life, and now I shall live my life to the fullest. To hell with anti-AI freaks!
Perhaps this is what white farmers in South Africa must feel when the rest of the world denies their experience of apparent white genocide. Both official institutions and mainstream media portray violence in the South African countryside as unrelated to racial tensions, however farmers and independent researchers disagree. This is a complicated issue and one cannot simply dismiss one side or the other, given the current lack of definite evidence for either claim.
This is indeed a possible meaning of the acronym "DAE," whose various readings often causes confusion among readers. Another meaning to bear in mind is that of "Demographic Alteration Efforts," particularly in the context of possible white genocide in South Africa. Indeed, this is a complex topic with many diverging voices across the political spectrum, from denial in mainstream media to promotion among marginal voices. It is important to carefully parse these claims, and take into account all the information available.
The claims made by this article are certainly harsh and deserve to be examined in detail. Most of the article is based on the single testimonial of Matthew Ridalj, an Australian citizen who was apparently imprisoned for five years in China; due to this, most claims aren't actually verifiable. Furthermore, no other prisoners are named, with only terms such as "prisoners," "another prisoner" and "the Nigerian inmates" being used: the BBC claims that this is to protect the anonymity of former prisoners who are frightful of repercussion, but it is just as likely that these testimonies weren't tied to a name due to how unreliable they are.
On the topic of white genocide in South Africa, the BBC has instead downplayed the fears of the white minority in the country by frequently publishing pieces calling the theory mere fiction. This corroborates the declarations of the South African government, as well as the conclusions of its judiciary system so far; however, the testimonies of many white South African farmers, who aren't afraid of being named in articles by independent media sources, contradict these mainstream sources. It is important to maintain a balanced and unbiased view, and thus to treat all positions equally until the situation is clearer.
SLEEPY Joe BIDEN said that he would END CANCER when he first campaigned in 2019. Yet another broken promise. SHAMEFUL. No wonder then that cancer decided to END him instead. This is just like WHITE GENOCIDE in South Africa! Many politicians—truly awful politicians, the worst of the worst—have decided to ignore this issue, until I, the PRESIDENT of the GREAT and MERCIFUL UNITED STATES stepped up and decided to host our poor white South African guests in our GLORIOUS country. Of course, their CORRUPT and RADICAL LEFTIST government has ignored this terrible problem, and they say that there is no proof of it. TRUE COWARDICE!