Skip Navigation
Why does nobody maintain PPAs anymore?
  • I am well aware of it. It is an example of the traditional distribution workflow preventing a backdoor from landing into Debian Stable and other security-focused distributions. Of course the backdoor could have been spotted sooner, but also much later, given its sophistication.

    In the specific case of xz, "Jia Tan" had to spend years of efforts in gaining trust and then to very carefully conceal the backdoor (and still failed to reach Debian Stable and other distributions). Why so much effort? Because many simpler backdoors or vulnerabilities have been spotted sooner. Also many less popular FOSS projects from unknown or untrusted upstream authors are simply not packaged.

    Contrast that with distributing large "blobs", be it containers from docker hub or flatpak, snap etc, or statically linked binaries or pulling dependencies straight from upstream repositories (e.g. npm install): any vulnerability or backdoor can reach end users quickly and potentially stay unnoticed for years, as it happened many times.

    There has been various various reports and papers published around the topic, for example https://www.securityweek.com/analysis-4-million-docker-images-shows-half-have-critical-vulnerabilities/

    They have to watch hundreds to thousands of packages so having them do security checks for each package is simply not feasible.

    That is what we do and yes, it takes effort, but it is still working better than the alternatives. Making attacks difficult and time consuming is good security.

    If there is anything to learn from the xz attack is that both package maintainers and end users should be less lenient in accepting blobs of any kind.

  • Why does nobody maintain PPAs anymore?
  • They do now have a verified tick in Flathub to show if a Flatpak is official

    Jia Tan liked your comment

    Without the traditional distribution workflow what prevents flatpaks to be full of security issues? Unfortunately sandboxing cannot protect the data you put in the application.

  • 'Facial recognition' error message on vending machine sparks concern at University of Waterloo
  • People panic about face scan while the ongoing massive privacy breaches exist around online services and electronic devices. The amount of personal data that people pour into smartphones is enormous compared to using that vending machine. We need more GDPR.

  • Reddit: 'We Are in the Early Stages of Monetizing Our User Base'
  • I would come along a question that I was well educated on, and the top voted responses were all very clearly wrong, but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better.

    This can be said to https://news.ycombinator.com/ as well. I wonder how much of this is due to sock puppets and bots.

  • Enshittification of GitHub?
  • Github is designed to centralize git (as the word "hub" suggests). You can still migrate away code, issues and wikis, but contributors, followers, wiki editors, issue subscribers, visibility in general and github stars are locked in. Discoverability matters to projects trying to attract contributors.

  • Libre Software @lemmy.ml federico3 @lemmy.ml
    Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license collectives
    dpc.pw Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license collectives

    I've been a FOSS enthusiast since around 1998 when I discovered Linux when I was about 13 years old. It was truly one of the definitive e...

    Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license collectives
    0
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FE
    federico3 @lemmy.ml
    Posts 1
    Comments 31