The New York Times published a hit piece on Mamdami, citing Crémieux
enthusiasticamoeba @ enthusiasticamoeba @lemmy.ml Posts 0Comments 124Joined 2 yr. ago
enthusiasticamoeba @ enthusiasticamoeba @lemmy.ml
Posts
0
Comments
124
Joined
2 yr. ago
Please calm down. I like it when we have words to describe specific concepts, and it seemed like the previous poster was saying that a word to describe this specific phenomenon was unnecessary because we already have the word to describe a broader phenomenon.
It's like "all ships are boats but not all boats are ships."
When someone starts talking about race science, I don't think it's a problem to call it race pseudoscience. I think it's more specific than just calling it racism. That's it. That's my whole point. I don't know why it's controversial here.