and you know it.

This is where you are wrong. You aren't commenting on the article.. You aren't even commenting on the post about the article. Your responding to a comment left on the post about the article.

It's you that's arguing in bad faith here, or at least not recognising the context of what you're saying, presumably because you're too busy trying to get across your own point.

I don't think your initial point about the criticism that should be levelled at Amazon is wrong (I think you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on here that supports what Amazon have done), but that isn't to say that the Foo Fighters shouldn't be being criticised here.

Both things can be true.

But by responding to a comment that points out the band's faults with whatabouttery you're kind of coming across like you're defending the band whilst also ignoring all the other people saying the same thing you are. Then on top of that having a go at the OP when he points out other people are talking about the Amazon issue by saying you're clearly taking about the article.... If you're commenting on the article why are you replying to some other post?!

The weather always does a good job of waking me up. It's why I stopped "listening" to Night Vale .

I've jumped back into Fallout: New Vegas recently. I've had a really hard time getting into games properly in the last few years, so figured trying a return to an old favourite might be worth a go. I've tried my hand in modding it a bit to try and make it feel a little less dated, and so far I'm enjoying it. That said due to chance I've not been able to get much more than 40 minutes at a go in game before something's lead me to have to go and do something else, but baby steps.

I'm looking forward to Baldur's Gate 3 later this week and I'm hoping it's not going to be another case of me playing a couple of hours and enjoying it before not returning to it for a few months, restarting it, not keeping it up, coming back a few months later and restarting it again ad infinitum.