Anon witnesses excellent security
azertyfun @ azertyfun @sh.itjust.works Posts 2Comments 902Joined 2 yr. ago
azertyfun @ azertyfun @sh.itjust.works
Posts
2
Comments
902
Joined
2 yr. ago
Ewwww no. No no no no NO. Fuck no. I don't want to share my bike lane with these things! They're heavier than most motorcycles! That's dangerous as all hell. A rear-end collision is likely to be deadly. Americans might be used to Surron being able to slap a couple fake pedals on their motorcycles to skirt the law, but that's absolutely insane. The point of a bike lane is to reduce conflict between heavy vehicles and fragile road users, not to separate "pedal havers" from "pedal not havers".
Thankfully in France - where they're from - and presumably most of the EU, bicycles with too much power (here in Belgium it's "speed pedelecs" which are capped at 4kW /45 km/h) are banned from all cycle lanes except where authorized by explicit signage.
Does not work around the necessity to get all major retail banks or the central bank on board, as they outline in their FAQ.
There's no magic bullet, if you want to act as a payment processor you only have a handful of options:
- Do a bank wire (but it's not pre-authorized so you're just providing a deposit account for your customers, like PayPal)
- Use Visa/MC (which PayPal falls back to if you have no money in your deposit account)
- Use regional payment processors where they exist (e.g. Bancontact/iDEAL in the Benelux, which Stripe conveniently abstracts for the retailers; however most countries don't have such a widespread alternative to American payment processors)
- Use physical cash
- Agree on a protocol to pre-authorize transfers on behalf of your customer with all banks your customers are likely to be using (in the EU you can do that with SEPA mandates, which PayPal does support as well)
In practice the EU is doing that last thing with Wero (which already has partnered with all major retail banks in Benelux+France+Germany) and Brazil successfully did the same with Pix. It's not that the technical part is particularly hard, it's that convincing the banking sector to adhere to and commercially promote a new standard is a long, expensive, arduous process that requires strong political connections.
And I want a unicorn for Christmas.
Look, right now I don't even have a good reason to hope that Israel will be stopped before they finish their genocide. But step 1 is to get a permanent ceasefire in place. Whatever fantasies we might have beyond that is a moot point. But recognizing both parties as sovereign would go some way towards facilitating the terms and enforcement of that ceasefire.
If you've got a plan to achieve that and doesn't involve genociding israel, shoot for it. But I don't think "unrecognizing" Israel is a particularly productive step towards that.
In this context? Someone who is currently on the good side of the current apartheid system in Israel/Palestine.
Don't play dumb with me, you know full well what I meant. If you have a point, make it.
So no Israel, just Palestine? That would leave Israelis a majority population in Palestine. Do you expect Israelis to magically not outvote the Palestinians, or are you proposing an autocracy or an apartheid system stripping Israelis of their voting rights?
I would also strongly suggest you do some reading on the factors leading up to the Rwandan genocide. A "just" peace isn't enough; after generations of life under apartheid, there are no easy or quick paths to lasting peace. I won't commit the hubris of pretending I have a definitive solution, and I think it's important to underline that as outsiders to the conflict, the best we can do is offer to safeguard peace. That's what the Two-State Solution was meant to do, that's what arms sanctions are meant to do, that's what the threat of economic retaliation would be meant to do (granted each with their own significant shortcomings). Denying the practical existence of either Israel or Palestine is antithetical to building a path towards lasting peace and a meaningful international effort towards safeguarding said peace.
For a practical example, assuming a peace treaty ever gets signed, sending UN Blue Helmets would be diplomatically easier if all parties involved recognized Palestine and Israel as sovereign states. Even if that all seems like a moot point right now what when neither Israel nor most Western nations are actually looking forward to peace.
I mean, it's a matter of opinion, but leather sucks in hot and in cold weather. It doesn't breathe so I get super sweaty, and it gets super cold in winter. So luxury cars compensate with heated seats and in-seat ventilation...
I've never considered the friction of my car seat to even be a factor, I don't tend to move much once I'm sat down.
So there are two interpretations I could make of your comment, one of which is more charitable than the other.
- You are using the Chinese and Israeli playbook of weaponizing statehood recognition as a value judgement. That is profoundly problematic, both on a practical and a philosophical level. De-humanization should not be a tool we have to use on our enemies. Our moral high ground should speak for itself.
- Your are dog-whistling for the genocide and/or deportation of all Israelis. In which case our conversation is done here.
To be clear, Israel is committing genocide and every single member of its government and of the IDF should be tried at The Hague. But laws and international order exist for a reason, and trying to circumvent them like this is a very bad look that Israel has been rightfully criticized for for decades.
The first part applies to... Most of the world outside of Europe?
The second part applies, to lesser degrees, to a large part of the world. Such as the USA.
What even is this argument. Israel's not a state? Well fucking great, so following that logic which state should we hold responsible for Israel's crimes then?
Europe's colonial past is a whole-ass subject but amongst all the potential ways to try to make up for it, "stop formally recognizing former colonies because we fucked it up too badly" is one of the worst takes I've heard.
So do regular fiat payment processors that are beholden to citizens and not faceless shareholders. Wero and Pix for instance.
Democratic governments are supposed to safeguard your ability to exchange legal tender for legal goods and services. The fact that Visa/MC have a duopoly and a stranglehold on the entire online economy is a major governance failure that needs to be rectified ASAP.
Crypto goes a lot further and says no-one, not even the government, should be able to prevent a transaction from taking place. Not necessarily an invalid idea but it does come with some huge unanswered challenges, such as "what happens when someone makes 1B€ through fraud and refuses to hand over the coins" and "how do we even prevent large-scale fraud in the first place".
Fabric is superior in comfort and cost.
But if you absolutely want leather for looks/stain resistance, there historically hasn't been much of a choice. Plastic fake leather alternatives degrade pretty badly under UV light, causing cracking/flaking after just a few years. As anyone who has owned a fake leather chair or jacket would have noticed. But the expected lifetime of a car interior is measured in decades.
The article mentions some startup innovating on new synthetic hemp-based fake leather, it'll be interesting to see if they can match the long-term durability of genuine leather. Otherwise it'll be a shame if those interiors fall apart in 5-10 years, reupholstering an entire car is not a small job.
At this point anyone who pretends like they don't know Trump is a fascist is either suffering from severe cognitive impairment and should seek medical attention, or more likely a fascist themselves. You don't get to live through the past 6 months and play the "but i didn't knoooooowwwww :((((((" card.
Pick a side and fight, but don't pretend that the fascist regime will go away with hearts and minds and a nice little conversation. These people know what they're doing, and they'll happily kill you to keep doing it. Resist or don't but don't pretend that this will go away by just motivating people to turn out next election cycle.
Did magisk become a lot better at hiding from banking apps? Because people have been saying "it's fine, just install magisk and use the option to hide it" but my experience is "it only works sometimes for some apps, otherwise you're fucked or you will be fucked next time the app updates its countermeasures". But that was a few years ago.
It's an absolute dealbreaker though. Without reliable mobile banking and eID it's very painful to do any kind of online payment or admin work.
I've seen a video (maybe it was Smarter Every Day?) about a research team experimenting with the effects and acclimation potential of small-radius coriolis stations. From what I remember we can get used to the centrifugal force well enough, even though experiencing coriolis forces across the length of your body is certainly an unusual situation.
Profitability is a huge problem regardless though. The ISS is getting destroyed by the end of the decade, and no replacement is seriously planned. The ISS was born in a geopolitical context of unprecedented international cooperation in the '90s, and that era is long gone. Unless China, the EU or US (lmao) wants to finance an ISS replacement all on their lonesome, not much will happen there for the foreseeable future. There's not a whole lot "because we can" budgets going around these days.
Railways and the energy market are the two areas where liberalization most spectacularly shat the bed. It increased prices, decreased reliability, didn't deliver on anything it was supposed to, and still the neoliberals are saying "one more market incentive bro, just one more incentive and we'll build productive competition into this natural monopoly".
Is it prejudice if I have extensive first-hand experience with it?
The worst environment to me (react-native)
Which is exactly what the Windows start menu runs on, doesn't it?
I don't even care that JS is slow, in most circumstances. I like Python, it's not any faster necessarily (though it is much easier to debug CPython than V8 when you do eventually run into low-level issues, and python is still a lot better at multithreading than javascript even if the GIL is an issue, but that's besides the point). My real problem is that the ES "standard" "library" is a complete clusterfuck, absolutely diseased, like engineers heard of the concept of technical debt and decided to build a shrine to it.
Sure, you can technically use JS decently. That's hardly an achievement. Any sufficiently fast Turing-complete apparatus can be "used decently" if you start by re-implementing a python interpreter. But the entire ecosystem is fucked. The appeal of javascript, the entire reason it has taken over, is that the lowest bidder is not going to use decently but will do the wildest, most insane shit imaginable to get a product out the door.
I commented the other day about PHP. Same problem. The language is too easy to use badly. Sure, you can write magnificent code in either, if you have enough experience and discipline to avoid every footgun. But when every other tool in your shop is an unlabeled footgun, maybe it's time to admit that there are some deep-seated issues.
Speaking of treating JS like a turing machine; that's what TypeScript does. And, I have to admit, it solves maybe 40 % of the problems I have with JavaScript. I still don't like it, because the stdlib and ecosystem still sucks donkey balls and V8 is a subpar JIT interpreter in every way besides raw single-threaded performance, but at least TS itself is decent enough and lends itself to static analysis well enough for senior engineers to have a hope of safely defusing or refactoring away most footguns set off by the junior/offshore devs. Most.
"I want predictable behavior for all possible inputs" is hardly a requirement that requires a fortune teller to see coming.
JavaScript has a particularly insane stdlib because this language wasn't designed, it is a botched chimera with deformities so severe it should have died 15 times over but people just won't let it.
Then to rub salt in the wound this horrific mess became the most popular language in the world by virtue of being the only language for the most popular application ecosystem in the world (the web). So the cancer is spreading and now you can find JavaScript in servers and fucking desktop environments and now your windows start menu takes five seconds to load because fucking react.js is loading the 75 polyfills necessary to make up for the fact that JS's "standard" library looks like it was designed by 3 cocained-up gibbons.
I've created the Aro community on blahaj, but I've found there's just not much to talk about.
How do you talk about something you don't feel or do?
One thing I'd be interested in is research into the causes of aromanticism, but last I checked there's literally zero academic research that treats it as distinct from asexuality.
I expect a strong link with autism due to the involvement of oxytocin.
Maybe I should run a poll in aro communities to check my theory, but I'm afraid that sample size and bias would make the results meaningless.
I hear that a lot but would that actually work? Sure, you will get a redhat level 1 support employee within the hour for a severity 1 ticket. But does the actual contract (which I don't have access to) make any legally binding guarantees regarding the time-to-resolution? I seriously doubt it. Which is to say -- your legal team will be SOL.
They also won't take responsibility for any fuckup on your part if you install a bad driver or deviate from the admin guides in anyway (which is why Legal says for a minor issue you can't apply a patch from StackExchange, you must raise a ticket and wait 3 business days for RedHat to tell you to apply the patch from StackExchange).
Getting phished definitely falls in this category BTW. Vendors may or may not help you but they certainly won't accept any liability.
It's still a good enough safety net to have for corporations with no trustworthy in-house expertise as vendors do have an incentive to keep their customers happy and most will help to the best of their abilities (which often isn't as much as one might think...), but it's hardly a legal panacea. If you need guarantees against catastrophic financial losses, that is what insurance is for.