Sounds like less of a Windows problem than an individual problem, though.

Blaming Windows cause your Frankenstein machine breaks often is disingenuous.

It's kind of a wide disparity for something that's so locked down, though. It's not as though one person is saying they get occasional issues and the other is they often have issues... it's one person basically saying their own personal computer is nigh unusable and the other providing an example of a large number of examples of that being extremely unlikely...

It's far more likely this individual is fucking up their computer on a regular basis, or has a very high bar of usability that is broken any time there is even the slightest hiccup or inconvenience.

That's as much as seeing a Star War!

I'd say it has to do with increased support of controllers. It used to be really hit or miss whether a controller would even work on the computer, much less with games.

I dont mind living a little further from a retail area of the city. It'd be nice to have better public transit, though.

I think its a bit silly to expect everyone to want to live in the exact same way though. Especially if it can feel cramped and claustrophobic to them.

I mean... obviously context matters. But its just automation. A person can do the same thing, just taking more time.

Automation shouldn't shield one from the consequences of their choices.

We're not all French, my boy, with baguette shops on every corner.

Just because one is right-hand dominant doesn't mean one has to use that hand for everything.

Personally, I do the same. Probably because I had a wallet and keys before I ever had a phone in my pockets, so its habit to put it in the unused one.

No wonder you people are so hell bent on ignoring climate change, you're waging a war on winter!

But not moldy, which is dangerous as opposed to inconvenient.

Can always throw the bread in the microwave for 10-15 seconds to give it some life anyways.

Someone decides what the algorithm is meant to do. It's not like it's wholly independent of human interaction. Just because you hide yourself behind layers of technology doesn't mean you're no longer liable for your decisions.

Obsessing about all those bad things, instead of the things you can change, is not helpful, though.

So.... "Who Wants to Live Forever"?

There's tons of new IP. It's just lots of people like sequels and reboots, so you're going to get a bunch of them as well.

The object of your ire is advertisers, if that's your problem.

So basically the only thing they care about is winning, not actually representing peoples values?

Theyre more than just an election committee, thats what the DCCC is for.

That's the internet pop-psychologist interpretation, but the people actually writing him often have him doing his best to better the Gotham around him. A lot of the petty thugs he catches are given chances to redeem themselves via Wayne based welfare programs.

Yeah, but in that Batman is basically Spider-Man with ex-Batman as a mentor.

Depends on the story.

And that "vengeance" is what taught him that vengeance is dumb, and it's better to fight to better the world around him than go after people Punisher style.

So basically you know very little, but have come to the conclusion that he sucks anyway?