It wasn't the actress, it was the pants, and them not being flattering.
The Twitter user nor the post mentioned anything about the actress. Did you see the picture in the post? Or are you just inserting preconceived biases here
It was in context to a show, and the thread was specifically talking about this
You should, but the hexbear mods are picky about what constitutes a valid opinion. I made a comment in another thread about not enjoying the new trend of baggy pants on women, got banned from the thread lol.
Lucky they agreed with you on this one
Wild that you can say this here
No eye damage in Ottawa, just brain damage
I don't see anyones pronouns on my feed lol, but in their profile it says "comrade" as a pronoun does it not?
Anyway, that's a very lib way of arguing - immediately calling people transphobic, even if that's not the issue at hand at all
If we're mincing words here, do you think the hard working neurotypical servers should step back so non-neurotypical or poor social skill folks can work in their place instead?
That's not true, I've worked with some train wrecks that kill it. Some are old, some are ugly, and many can really only put on a happy face for 10 seconds at a time.
The majority of the population is neurotypical, it's a stretch to re-structure the whole system for a very small percentage of folks who aren't. I'd even be willing to guess that many of those people probably don't even want a customer facing job if their social skills are a dumpster fire. Alternatively, these kinds of jobs are good at making you better, social skills wise.
But if you really don't like any aspect of what you're doing, you're not going to do it well, doesn't really matter who you are
Yeah I'd agree with that
We're like brothers comrade!
Yeah I get where you're coming from, but when you have nights that you pull in $500+ in tips (plus minimum wage), you don't really want to have to go back to minimum wage + nothing. Even with the gamble of the odd asshole not paying.
Not having a cap on how much you can make that's not based on time, is huge.
Nah I belong here, right next to you...comrade...
Username checks out
Lol! Touché
There'd be hardly any parents left if you could jail bad parents on whim based on a singular observation.
Then many of those kids would be even worse off...
Thinking back to the very "concerned parents" of my childhood, they were usually the over protective lunatics
Restaurant owner? Fast food?
Ya know, if you give really good service at a restaurant you can make a killing as a server/bartender. But if you just want to do mediocre work, I guess $20/hr at fast food sounds enticing
Kitchen staff being the exception, but I dunno what they're referencing because the article is hidden behind a paywall
I definitely read "sharting" at first glance
How else would you go about removing the two parties from power?
I don't think continuing to support the party with a vote is really the answer here.
Your solution to losing is to now bandwagon with "the lesser of two evils"? Why wouldn't you abandon that party entirely? There's more than two choices.
They'll kill and take away the rights of people who aren't you though...yay...
To top it off, you go on to bash those who think that's not a good choice
The irony.
But don't listen to me, I'm the stupid one.
FedNow appears to be launching July 23, 2023. To me, it doesn't seem very good in the sense that the Fed now gets to be a middle man to payment transactions (sure it's "instant" but we're all aware that security != convenience).
It's also a "centralized" solution.
It could be a stepping stone to a centralized digital bank currency is my fear. And also the fed will now be able to see/monitor all transactions through it.