Just because these were voluntary non-reciprocal dispositions of wealth would not automatically make this not fraud in Germany at least.
I talked with a few fellow students and their gut feeling was that this could be fraud as well. After talking a bit about the matter we had quite a few issues apart from the voluntary aspect as well.
All dispositions in fraud are voluntary for one, otherwise this would be in the ballpark of robbery and the like (as in involuntary dispositions).
The act of giving a gift is not necessarily irreversible as there are ways to fight the disposition on grounds of fraud for one. Which would tick one of the requirements of fraud: the disposition needs to be unlawful.
Anyway you're right in that there are quite a few reasons to conclude this isn't fraud. If it is, it would be a very "heavy" case which would make this a felony in Germany.
Fraud is a very complicated crime. I absolutely hate that I need to know the basic for my law degree as it fills a thousand pages of commentary literature in just one of the largest German legal commentaries because it's just that complicated.
Meanwhile the Chinese ambassador to Germany has been called in by the German foreign ministry after an airplane in service of the German Airforce has been targeted by a laser defense system onboard a Chinese frigate. The plane was deployed on the EU mission to safeguard international trade in the red sea
Ist ja gut, du bist bestimmt auch einer der sich räuspert, wenn jemand Raketen anstatt Lenkflugkörper sagt oder Kugeln anstatt Projektile - aber ich respektiere deine sprachliche Korrektheit
Deutschland testet auch schon seit längerem Laser insbesondere für die Luftabwehr auf seegehenden Einheiten. Besonders temperaturempfindliche oder infrarotempfindliche Systeme können davon geschädigt werden.
Daneben werden auch Luftabwehrsysteme basierend auf Mikrowellen getestet
The part that is not allowed outside of camping areas is setting up a tent that damages the ground by flattening it and blocking circulation due to the ground sheet.
If you camp without a tent or don't have a ground sheet, you're perfectly fine.
Müsste eigentlich. Petitionen sind in Deutschland selten verbindlich - können sie auf Bundesebene nie.
Daher müsste es jedenfalls aufgrund der Antidiskriminierungsregeln der EU es jedem EU-Bürger offen stehen mit abzustimmen. Unter Umständen kann aber ein Wohnsitz erforderlich sein, weil ansonsten ein Partizipationsinteresse am deutschen demokratischen Diskurs fragwürdig ist
Pls dear god, pls let them hit and massively damage the German and US consulate/ambassy, maybe then some of those that refuse to accept the reality will wake up - Sincerely a German
Es lohnt sich aber ihn zu lesen, teile mir ein ZEIT Abo daher hab ich den Artikel schon gelesen.