The part you wrote. The first post definitely, and then also this last post. It's the words you used, and then the order you placed those words in.
I mean, this shit has been going back and forth longer than we' been alive. Saying one side is the aggressor is using some pretty heavy blinders.
Your method of saying one combatant is wrong and the other combatant is good is laughable. It just reeks of insincerity and propaganda for some party that wants more war in the world.
You're just talking emotionally laden propaganda. From the way you talk, you just want war.
Why does this community think there shouldn't be a ground invasion after 1000s of missles are launched at a country? All I ever hear is emotionally charged statements against Israelis. But people keep punching the big kid and then keep getting mad when he punches back.
Wow, you seem like a fun person to be around.
I'm responding to someone saying you can't debate it's a war crime. And your response is terrorism is not real.
You are a poor Russian troll, sir. And you should be worried someone will throw you out a window for your bad arguments.
I mean. It legally doesn't fall under the definition of terrorism, so there is that argument, lol.
I bet that felt good 👍. And your very small group of an echo chamber agreed with you.
The problem is you want to feel better. Not change something. Some people just like feeling better than others, others like making other things better.
This type of argument may make you feel better, but it doesn't really help anything but make you think better of yourself. Listen to what others say in discourse, or they won't listen to you.
Far too many make enemies out of allies and hurt their own cause in the process.
Lol, if there was an anti-anybody militia that sometimes acted against other states within the US. The US would raid their complex, set it on fire, and shoot people trying to escape.
Then, the government would blame the children and other non-combatants' deaths on the militia. The public then will watch documentaries made on the subject over dinner.
Pager bombs aimed at extremists are not an American concern. Even if there was a level of non-combatant causilities. If anything, it's a fun news blip of the week and will be forgotten in less than a month.
Hezbollah paramilitary targeted by ISF black ops spooks is the same in your mind as a UK Labor MP being assassinated?🙄
Yep, ya got me there. Ouch.
Militia not backed by a state are classified as unlawful combatants.
Honestly, it's a pretty brilliant idea. It did what it was intended to do.
I see that's what this crowd is getting out of the article. Title literally mentions it's on track. And funds have been raised and being raised by the evil rich.
It's futile to fight this type of internet rhetoric with logic. The sophomoric arguments of pure communism, socialism, or capitalism are made from great minds of the early 1900's. Yet people in lemmy flock together behind "capitalism" is bad.
Why use logic against childish arguments. It's more satisfying to poke at the echo chamber.
That's weird comrade because I was using inductive logic.
Sounds like lots of words for poor people littering to me.