The article contains a number of what seems to be assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a behaviour not representative of these people as a group. It's notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.
Yes but appdata subfolder is local, locallow or roaming so the poster above you is still correct.
We shouldn't jump to conclusions
Immediately jumps to conclusions
The article states that an image was uploaded to X which seemed to imply that US foreign policy resulted in what is currently happening in Gaza, whereas Chinese policy leads to the current prosperity in Xinjiang. Which is quite a frightening comparison.
Quite literally, I would say.
What's there to police? It's not like most aggressors are openly grabbing people in their genitals for all to see. These people know that they are wrong and so they hide it. What am I, as a man against this behaviour, supposed to do about other men?
Well of course it will be different. One has to do with another author publishing questionable data and the other would be related to misunderstanding of someone else's published data. In this case, the use of AI in writing is implied to result in authors not being in control of what they themselves publish.
All of these are bad but do not necessarily arise on purpose. But let's not add ways to muddy the already mudied waters of science.