Woman divorces husband after ChatGPT reads his coffee grounds and predicts affair
Michael @ M1ch431 @slrpnk.net Posts 0Comments 262Joined 6 mo. ago

This is about as psychotic as governments using AI to predict crimes.
We didn't have internet or the means to properly educate ourselves (at least to today's standards) for much of the 20th century. And now, we're finally at the point where laypeople anywhere can simply look this stuff up with relative ease. Though, few do or are aware that common corporations are responsible for atrocities.
Thanks for doing your part in spreading that awareness, even if that's not the point you were trying to make.
The company did not answer whether it or the outside firm it hired communicated or consulted with the Israeli military as part of its internal probe.
In its statement, the company also conceded that it “does not have visibility into how customers use our software on their own servers or other devices.” The company added that it could not know how its products might be used through other commercial cloud providers.
Microsoft said the Israeli military, like any other customer, was bound to follow the company’s Acceptable Use Policy and AI Code of Conduct, which prohibit the use of products to inflict harm in any way prohibited by law. In its statement, the company said it had found “no evidence” the Israeli military had violated those terms.
Those three quotes stick out to me as proof that they are pleading ignorance.
A military is not "like any other customer". Forbid access and fact-find some more or stop pretending that you aren't complicit in AI being used for harm.
Nobody wants to live in an age of unregulated AI use besides the power-hungry and the short-sighted — and even those people probably won't like the consequences once the boomerang comes back.
Let's not throw the boomerang, please. Do better.
The company did not answer whether it or the outside firm it hired communicated or consulted with the Israeli military as part of its internal probe.
In its statement, the company also conceded that it “does not have visibility into how customers use our software on their own servers or other devices.” The company added that it could not know how its products might be used through other commercial cloud providers.
Microsoft said the Israeli military, like any other customer, was bound to follow the company’s Acceptable Use Policy and AI Code of Conduct, which prohibit the use of products to inflict harm in any way prohibited by law. In its statement, the company said it had found “no evidence” the Israeli military had violated those terms.
Those three quotes stick out to me as proof that they are pleading ignorance.
A military is not "like any other customer". Forbid access and fact-find some more or stop pretending that you aren't complicit in AI being used for harm.
Nobody wants to live in an age of unregulated AI use besides the power-hungry and the short-sighted — and even those people probably won't like the consequences once the boomerang comes back.
Let's not throw the boomerang, please. Do better.
The original source is a verified, leaked email (dated April 23, 2015) from her 2016 campaign. The DNC plan was attached in the email and can be found here.
The specific quote is from Salon.
The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton’s camp insisted that Trump and other extremists should be “elevated” to “leaders of the pack” and media outlets should be told to “take them seriously.”
She may not be playing now, but I feel it's fair to point out that Hillary has played some stupid games - the American people reap the stupid prize.
In all seriousness - I wouldn't because I value people's privacy, but I imagine it'd all be quite lucrative with the data economy being what it is.
Apologies, I was half-asleep when I wrote that.
I guess every media outlet that I've looked at is reporting this wrong for saying he was backing young progressives. Even his website claims that. But I know Democrats love to tease at being progressives to appeal to voters, and then shift back to the right.
Just because protests aren't being covered by the mainstream media doesn't mean they don't exist. And a significant portion of liberal spaces are becoming radical in sentiment, even if some are still constrained to hoping Bernie and AOC will save them in 2028. You aren't going to hear me praise anything going on as being sufficient, though.
It's definitely warmed my heart hearing your thoughts and insights.
I do actually think Quorn is around in some retailers, but it is expensive - it's not terribly expensive though. I liked it when I consumed it in the past and it agreed well with me. Beyond/Impossible have a small amount of amount of problematic ingredients (like avocado oil in one of them - which I am allergic to, not just sensitive to), but the main issue I simply can't afford them.
I recently moved back to a rural area and I don't access to a Kroger/Whole Foods/Wegmans (not that supporting any chain is really something I'm proud of), so admittedly my options are limited. This interaction prompting me to find out that chickpea tofu is available locally and that pumfu is available (though a bit far from my location) is completely life-changing.
I'll have to get nutritional yeast, I didn't realize it was an (albeit small) protein source - it's a great seasoning. The defatted peanut powder seems very good to order in bulk. I had no idea about lab-grown dairy protein, it sounds great and I will consider it as well. I didn't realize quinoa had a modest amount of protein, so I will have to incorporate that. And I'll have to trial oats to see if they bother me. I take a plant-based multivitamin for vegans (Ora) already so I should be good to transition over anytime I want to a fully plant-based diet.
I have always aspired to go vegan, and was a practicing vegetarian for many years. It was wrecking my health, and I really almost didn't know what to do. It took me a while (and many years in denial) to realize wheat and soy were the culprits that were specifically bothering me. So for many years, I have mainly ate fish, a moderate amount of beans, some cheese, or ate some free-range eggs, and small amounts of poultry (which does not bring me any joy to admit). None of the aforementioned (besides beans) are things I'm particularly fond of consuming for various reasons (which we likely are 110% on the same page on), but I admit on some levels I'd had given up on trying to find what agrees with my body.
Our interaction has renewed my interest in exploring my options though. I probably misread your intent too, I know I err on the side of naive optimism and that usually doesn't result in the best interactions with people who are informed on the state of the world, but damn it, I'm just tired of giving up and seeing others give up.
Thank you for exposing me to your knowledge once again. I am sorry to have reacted strongly earlier too. It was unfair to you.
Thank you. I am very grateful for your insights. I haven't asked for help much at all in my life and I appreciate it more than you know.
I am unsure what generally causes my discomfort in the bean department. Soy and tofu cause very awful non-allergic reactions, but I will look into this further. As for wheat, I highly suspect it's more than a sensitivity, though I don't particularly want to pursue a diagnosis for celiac disease if I can just avoid it.
I tend to do fine with moderate amounts of pinto beans, kidney beans, black beans, chickpeas, and a few others, but admittedly it seems like there are more beans that I can try and vary. Lentils seem to give me some trouble though, which is unfortunate because I like them more than most beans.
Pea protein and peanut butter seem to be fine. I will look into pumfu (sounds life-changing) and defatted peanut butter and incorporate those into my diet. I tend to do fine with pumpkin seeds and peanuts, but I also have issues with high fat content food. Great suggestions, I had no idea they were a thing. I don't really care about taste, I just want to be healthy and make choices that align with my ethics.
You put a smile on my face. Sorry to be perceivably negative, the situation on this planet is incredibly frustrating for everybody with a desire for a better future and I don't want to alienate anyone. Thanks once again.
Edit: Apparently chickpea tofu is a thing too. I will have to try that because chickpeas are a bean I tolerate the most. I just never shopped at the local retailer that stocks it. Pumfu is proving hard to find near me unless I go 36 miles to obtain it, but maybe I can stock up if I ever have to go that way.
Could you please help me figure out protein sources that are non-meat and don't include wheat or soy? I have trouble digesting large quantities of beans. It's affecting my health.
And of course I greatly appreciate you. I realize you aren't seeking approval. I think wanting to ease the suffering of others that exist is also admirable. People like us are attempting to trailblaze a better future and of course it's worthy of recognition.
Well, as it stands the vast majority of the world is coerced or propagandized into consenting to governments and regulators for them to do nothing and let disaster manifest. They are mostly all blissfully unaware.
Give it a couple years of Trump's reign to see how people react to somebody taking away their rights before you completely give into cynicism and close yourself to the possibility of garnering hope.
Your personal choices are your own decision, but I do think it's admirable for you to claim personal responsibility.
Though, shaming or judging others for wanting to have a family and continue their genetic line is not something I advocate for.
Your small steps to reduce your impact simply aren't enough. Even if they were bigger than they are, it still doesn't put you on a pedestal to look down on others for their decisions. You are free to do so, but you won't get my approval.
We need worldwide change. Vastly reducing animal agriculture and non-essential industry is imperative.
Choosing to not consume meat doesn't solve the major issue. It doesn't make even make a small dent and virtue signalling about your choices doesn't do anything either.
People buy this stuff because it's usually cheap and readily available. It's cheap and readily available because there is almost no regulation.
Slowly phasing out factory farming and animal agriculture and replacing it with lab-grown meat is necessary. We also need to explore non-meat protein sources more seriously, the options that exist just suck, they are expensive (besides tofu), and many products contain common allergens, like soy and wheat.
I'm seeing a bit of a shift in others' attitudes. I'm usually everywhere discussion is found online. Things just seem to have gotten more real to people and that seems to be what is prompting this. Plus the propaganda from the usual places just isn't hitting the same.
Most people cope with reality by escaping or distracting themselves - e.g. into various hobbies, interests, habits. It doesn't really help that media and games just kinda suck anymore and hobbies/habits are more expensive than ever.
I'm doing my best to soften the hearts of those who engage in feckless browbeating, as you aptly described it. Usually behind the veneer of hate and hard feelings is a very sensitive and vulnerable person who is seeking rather harmless things (like validation, approval, camaraderie, community). Of course, that's not always the case - sometimes people are caught up into hate and bad faith without even realizing it, and some absolutely do intend on spreading hate and operating in bad faith.
Regardless, I just do my best to clear things up for everyone and it seems to help. I don't delude myself into thinking my impact is very large, but I do intend on helping others in a general sense - and I know I have helped many.
Well, fortunately Trump is doing a pretty good job at radicalizing everybody in the US (and outside the US) against the status quo/world order and those who uphold it.
Hopefully we will never resort to that sort of violence to address our problems though.
If this was about what personally upsets or offends me, and not the fate of the world and everybody who lives on it, maybe I'd agree with you.
I don't block others, just block me if I bother you so much to accuse me of stalking you.
Let's not kid ourselves. Publicly available information is invasive and a violation of privacy.
We have corporations who have effectively set up mass surveillance networks and they call it "adtech".
There is an entire economy surrounding "publicly available information". There are corporations that act as as data brokers and people search websites that compile way too much sensitive information about private individuals. Newspapers systematically report on events that aren't really of public interest concerning private individuals; e.g. arrest records and these articles hang around forever even if the arrest doesn't result in a conviction or the crime is expunged.
If this was employed by the government or law enforcement, it would absolutely include data that extends far beyond the reaches of publicly available information — and it's worth pointing out that the US has a mass surveillance network in the form of the NSA/PRISM.
There is zero way you could convince me that AI, prone to hallucination, would be well served to predict crime or criminals. Even if it didn't hallucinate, it still wouldn't be possible to predict crime — only potentially anticipate a crime. We aren't 2D characters following a script — anything can happen.
Law enforcement is already very unhinged. Let's not cheerlead the addition of any tools that aid in psychosis to their arsenal.