A normally weighted die has a weight of 16.67% for each face. No matter what result the first die rolls, the second one has a 16.67% chance of rolling the number needed to total 7. Therefore, the average chance of a (total of) 7 is (16.67 + 16.67 + 16.67 + 16.67 + 16.67 + 16.67) / 6, or, 16.67%, or, 1 in 6.
Consider your example: Die #1 has the following weights:
1: 0%
2: 20%
3: 20%
4: 20%
5: 20%
6: 20%
In your example, if die 2 rolls a 6, there's a 0% chance of a (total of) 7, instead of the normal 16.67%, but if die 2 rolls a 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, it has a 20% chance of totaling 7, instead of the normal 16.67%.
The average chance, therefore, is (0 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 6, or, 16.67%, or, 1 in 6.
Without having stats to back it up, it seems perfectly logical to me. Cishet men are the people conservative views benefit the most, and they're the people folks like Andrew Tate specifically target. If I had to make a blind guess, I'd have said it's cishet men, too.
There's a number of apps that actually help with this; I used to use SleepCycle, not sure if that one's still good. Basically, you set up the app and tell it how long you want to sleep, then set the phone on the side of the bed. It uses the accelerometer to detect when you fall asleep, and how deeply you're sleeping (there's some that use fitness bands or other monitoring tools, if you use them), and will wake you up close to your desired wake time, when you're in light sleep / between REM cycles. For instance, if you set the alarm for 2 hours, it might wake you up after 1 hr 45 minutes, if that's when you're sleeping lightly, rather than wait the full 2 hours and wake you up in the middle of a deep sleep.
The end result is that you don't get those times when your alarm goes off and you feel awful, as that's typically caused by an interrupted REM cycle.
The odds that the first die landed on the correct number are 1 in 6, though, so if you're considering the throw of both dice as a whole, the chance is still 1 in 6 regardless of which die you throw first. (If you're rolling the unweighted die first and then evaluating the chance of getting a 7 based on that outcome, then you're correct.)
No, it wouldn't, as long as only one of the dice is weighted.
If it has a 95% chance to roll a 6, and a 5% chance to roll any other number, or a 100% chance to roll a 6, or a 0% chance to roll a 6, the chance is still 1 in 6 to roll a 7 with two dice (where either zero or one is weighted).
Nice of him to give them the heads up, so they can all go find new jobs now. Sure would be poetic if they all just moved elsewhere and left Amazon understaffed.
Their entire post history is, for the most part, this sort of thing. It's like a weird roleplay account that's just not working out, I don't know. That or this is just their entire personality.
That one really baffles me. Prey 2017 would have been right up my alley, but I completely ignored it because I didn't like Prey 2006. By the time I discovered that it was a game I'd have been interested in, I picked it up on sale for $10 or so. I wonder how many other people had similar experiences.
I love the callout that the story was delivered via text logs, as if voice acting was typically present in anything except FMV-based games in that time period. "Bog standard FPS" is a really funky term for an era when there were only really a few well-known FPS games out there at all.
You've got to remember that Marathon 1 was released in 1994, the same year Doom II was released. What else was there at that point? You really had Doom, Marathon, Pathways Into Darkness (also a Bungie title and only sort of an FPS at all), Wolfenstein 3D, System Shock, Hexen / Heretic, and some really niche ones that most people had never even heard of at the time, never mind now.
Since several journalists wrote about this issue, Meta has made it clearer to users when interactions with its bot will be shared to the Discover tab.
So it wasn't even an error that they were being made public? Holy shit. I figured the response would be 'Oops, sorry, that never should have been made available publically', but it seems the only error was that it wasn't made clear to users that it would be.
Ideally while having someone who isn't you record the interaction, so when they drop you to the pavement and your phone 'regrettably' gets smashed to pieces, there's still some external record of what went down.
T-Mobile was one of the 20 or so companies that sponsored his birthday parade. I suspect they'd just bend over and take it.
Twenty two corporations and foundations are sponsoring the 250th Army Birthday Parade and Festival on the National Mall, according to the Army. General Dynamics and USAA are the presenting sponsors for the festival, which is also benefiting from a long list of companies and nonprofits including: the Gary Sinise Foundation, Bell Textron, Wounded Warrior Project Wal-Mart, GOVX, Leonardo DRS, RTX Corporation, Lockheed Martin, Leidos, Armed Forces Mutual, Boeing, First Command, General Electric Aerospace, T-Mobile, King George, InterContinental Hotels Group and the NFL.
Trump has a proven track record for releasing quality products that are exactly as advertised and always end up being wildly successful and definitely not scams or grifts. His brand is synonymous with quality and integrity. I don't know why you'd even question this.
Technology advances quickly and lawmaking advances slowly. 50 years ago, this wouldn't have been nearly as much of a problem, because the flow of information would be a lot slower, and fewer people would be exposed to these things. Today, Trump posts something hate-filled on the internet and his followers everywhere in the country see it immediately. Same goes for any other person with social media influence. If Elon Musk posts something provably false, tens of millions of people consume it. A hundred people can post the proof that it's false within minutes, and a fraction of those people will see it and even fewer will care.
The problem isn't the speech, the problem is the platform they're given.
That's actually a great subject for an XKCD What If - What if all of the CO2 was suddenly removed from the atmosphere, all at once?