Jiggle_Physics @ Jiggle_Physics @sh.itjust.works

Posts

21

Comments

730

Joined

7 mo. ago

The state of Germany was put down twice, completely dismantled, and ceded. There are still a lot of Germans around. Do you not differentiate between a state and the people residing in it?

Well, we know they did at least one major act of elections fraud, but Pence wouldn't do their bidding and use the fraudulent electoral slates from 7 or so states. Which got him black balled by the GOP. So, who knows what else is happening.

Well, most of US media is made in, or by companies in, those two cities.

And if your pfp is a profile cross-section of a human head with a baby curled, and sleeping, where the brain would otherwise be?

No, it doesn't. Nazis are people choosing to believe in a genocidal ideology, people that believe their way want me dead, like it is part of their ideology that I should die. My sentiment that people who believe I should not be alive, are not tolerable, is not the same as someone hating the japanese people of today, because of trauma from WW2. .

As far as I have been able to find, the material published on there being a higher per capita amount of preds in the LGBTQ community have been discredited, and most of these claims come from a small number of papers, largely published years ago, by conservative groups pay

Criticism of American imperialism is an international sport at this point, where did they get this idea that the US isn't criticized for this stuff? Have they only watch OAN? Probably a 'bot'

Is that sect the JWs?

Your Nazi example doesn't work. If you had said the only good German, is a dead German, then it would make sense. Being German is an inherent quality that the person had no say in. Being a Nazis was a choice of political affiliation. The vast majority of people who think the only good Nazi is dead one, are making a call based the person's actions, one that means they support a genocidal ideology. If you support genocide, you are too anti-social to be accepted into society.

Yeah, another person who doesn't seem to understand the difference between an inherent trait, like being Japanese, and a personal choice, like their political affiliation

They didn't call him weak though? The post uses him as an example of men being highly emotional in a professional setting, which is something many of these same men claim should exclude women from numerous careers.

There is a large amount of the Queer community that practice witchcraft and other esoterica. It is often seen as a spiritual safe space for people outside of hetero-normative society.

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+the+US+economic+system+was+designed+to+benefit+white+men

The US was systemically constructed to funnel wealth specifically to white men, like I said in the last comment. Your reading comprehension sucks. If you want a detailed explanation of this I suggest reading one of the many papers written on the subject, by experts, that are available online. For now, though, time to do something other than talk to an online wall. Have fun!

Also, I never said white billionaires were worse than others, I said that there is a reason to call out white billionaires with this piece of legislation due to it being american.

Because they US has been systemically constructed to funnel wealth specifically to white men. There are a lot of papers out there that discuss the history, reasoning, mechanics, etc of the whole thing, and why it is important. These papers are easy to find, if you actually want to know.

The fact that you think staying on subject is important here because the subject is the US, and not some other subject, is stupid. You can, physically, talk about anything, at any time. However, if you wander into a conversation about one group, doing a thing, and start interjecting talking points about another group, you are just being an asshole, at worse, or very unaware of how conversation is generally held, at best. I also never implied it was due to lack time. I have implied it was due to lack of desire to do the work, especially when that work has already been done, and is readily available online, by people who are experts in the subject matter.

I am not typing out an academic paper for you to explain why someone talking specifically about the US would use the modifier "white" when discussing these issues, as they pertain to the US. If you are not able to grasp the concept of a conversation having a subject, and not discussing things outside of it, I doubt you would be able to grasp something more complicated.

If you attempt to understand that you are replying to something on the subject of the US, specifically, I might take time to explain something to you that could much more adequately be explained by reading an article found from a search on the subject.

Did you not look at the post you are commenting on before you decided to comment? I do not understand how you didn't know this post was about the US when the person in the post is talking about the US's independence day holiday, and the announcement of the passing of US legislation on that day, but believed you had a valid opinion on the subject. The whole thing is about the US. If you read a post, and you are uninformed about what it is talking about, or otherwise do not understand it, maybe rather than commenting what's what about it, you instead look it up, or ask someone first.

Kevin Nash, the person who made the post in the screen shot, is talking about the US when he mentions white billionaires. There is a long, detailed, well understood, history of racism within the wealth disparity of the US. Racism that favors white men. If you would like to know that history, you can look it up, it is an easy subject to find information about.

When you are talking about the US specifically it is pertinent. I know you want strip racist aspects of these things from the conversation, but that is stupid.