They should really ban smoking on Russian ships. /s
Does the DOJ's opinion, binding or not, actually matter with respect to this though? Impeachment is solely the prerogative of the House, and more broadly Congress. I don't see how the DOJ as part of the executive branch can thus bind the House at all in this.
(Also worth noting that Impeachment technically isn't a legal matter -- it is a political process.)
Only war criminals go to bed.
It really depends on what legal/administrative framework the state has. I'm pretty sure in my state the governor can remove any officer for things like malfeasance, absenteeism, and neglect of duty.
Unlike the split in authority between Federal and State governments, counties and municipalities are simple political subdivisions of the states, and so the state is much more free legally to intervene in their affairs.
It's not practically an opinion piece, it is wholly an opinion piece.
A Western defence source confirmed to the BBC the footage shows a Challenger 2 tank and that all crew survived.
Tank did it's job, then.
Because there's sales text in the "educational" article.
You should use an XMPP server that respects your privacy. If you truly want privacy and don’t want to trust any server, we recommend setting up your own server. If this beyond your technical interests then we can setup a server for you and hand over the passwords. If we setup a server for you, then you’d pick the domain name and get complete control over who can use it.
But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.
That seems like a distinction without a difference.
Not to mention it solves nothing for the mass shooting epidemic. Most of them seem suicidal anyway.
This used to be the only reason, however in the last couple years we're starting to see streaming services remove their original programming (owned and produced by themselves/their parent or affiliate studios). Seemingly just so they don't have to pay more in royalties.
Keep in mind most of those articles are pretty unrealistic IMHO. Unless there's a conviction in the January 6th court case I don't think there's any chance he's barred from running in any state.
Obviously it doesn't apply to .com or .xyz, but in addition to the concerns about being locked in to Cloud flare's name servers, they don't support some gTLDs right now.
It's not a huge deal. He's not really a flight risk -- the Secret Service protective detail is on him 24/7.
From what I've read this Marcel LUX III SARL company is also just a holding company under EQT. So nothing major has changed there.
I mean, Canonical is also privately held and not publicly listed. And it looks like this is the same private equity firm that owned SUSE fully before taking them public. (Marcel LUX III SARL is a holding company owned by EQT Private Equity.)
Because they're a disorganized clusterfuck and he couldn't be bothered to slightly delay filming to get the proper card. Because for whatever reason they've decided they must churn out content at such a high pace that everything they do is like this now.
Honestly the only videos from the last year where I remember things not being totally jank were videos with Emily, but she's barely been in anything since coming out a few months ago.
Tbh that's how almost all of their projects seem to be now. Woefully unprepared, full of jank.
It's true that would be the ideal way to go about this. However, I'm also weighing that vs Linus saying this should've been handled privately (which implies off the record).
