a docker
Something tells me you don't really know Docker
Your comment was nearly relevant to the Go community you posted it in.
It was not.
It won't be.
Das ist aber etwas plakativ formuliert, kann man das noch etwas unterfüttern? Selbst Schwarzfahren ist eine Straftat, aber in keinster Weise mit dreifachem Mord und mehrfachem Mordversuch zu vergleichen.
Ich will rechte Gewalt gewiss nicht relativieren. Die Relativierung islamistischer Gewalt führt aber ebenfalls zu nichts.
So you're saying we should create a programming language called "Welsh" with C-like function names?
syncthing also relies on a web server for device discovery, it's just that you're probably using someone else's server instead of hosting your own.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I also think that Vaultwarden itself doesn't have access to the unencrypted password database. In that sense it's E2EE similar to KeePass, the only difference being that KeePass is a desktop app and Vaultwarden a web app.
Mag der Definition mach kein Rauchen sein, aber sonderlich förderlich für die Lunge ist es trotzdem nicht...
Nothing, this is not about that.
This change gives you the guarantee that .internal domains will never be registered officially, so you can use them without the risk of your stuff breaking should ICANN ever decide to make whatever TLD you're using an official TLD.
That scenario has happened in the past, for example for users of FR!TZBox routers which use fritz.box. .box became available for purchase and someone bought fritz.box, which broke browser UIs. This could've even been used maliciously, but thankfully it wasn't.
Being in alpha and having breaking changes is fine, the question is how many. My impression is that Immich seems to introduce breaking changes far more frequently than what people might be used to from other projects.
And that does go back to professionalism: The better you plan ahead, the fewer breaking changes you have to impose on your users.
Minio now describes itself as "S3 & Kubernetes Native Object Storage for AI" - lol
Guess it's time to look for alternatives if you're not doing ML stuff
currently being tested
They've been "testing" it for more than a decade at this point and even if Russia is able to actually bring the T-14 into service, they won't be able to produce any significant number of them for the same reason their tank corps isn't using many T-90M right now.
pure garbage
Go look up Operation Desert Storm and rethink what you wrote there.
If there's anything here that's garbage, it's your notions about tank design.
more manoeuvrable
Ah yes, there's nothing quite like a 4 km/h reverse speed. That's a really tangible factor making the T-72 a better tank.
Wait till you find out what Russia and China are doing on Facebook
Who cares? They're just pedestrians, it's not like they're honest car-driving citizens
~ 'murica