So corruption is legal now

Awesome, ya that's a reasonable path, if you want to skip the manual review, you could use TLSNotary or ZKEmail (proof of email) to verify/validate TLS sessions or emails (basically checks that the email was validly signed by the email server from a sender, and you can selectively reveal that the person for example, paid a utility bill in London)

This is great, we need more of this. Now you just need TLSNotary for someone to be able to prove they have citizenship/are allowed to vote in that election.

That's a t80

He might have been epsteined though

I hope he goes home and takes it easy, he did enough

Good for him, I hope he is ok

Lol gross

Hey, you have my GitHub pfp lol, nice. github.com/atheartengineer

Yep, CPU scheduler is the correct answer. Id recommend reading this arch wiki on it. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/improving_performance

Hey I'm very interested in new chat protocols/methods/paradigms. I wrote an anonymous chat app called Discreetly in the fall to experiment with anonymous groups and interactions.

Want to DM me? Would love to get on a call

I don't think you can

That's correct, some still find it disrespectful though.

Ok, we are talking in circles, you have your opinions, I have mine. If you want to talk about this over voice at any point, let me know, I don't think text is going to get anywhere, and Lemmy has a pretty strong bias against crypto (which I understand, but obviously disagree with)

Ya you should always have at least 2 stages of animals/plants between any feed/nutrient cycle or you risk disease and build up of things like sodium

Which is a whole lot of extra engineering that is already taken care of with a blockchain. Whether social networks should forget your username/registration is a different debate.

But there's no global consensus, it's not trustless, and smart contracts unlock a lot of additional composable capabilities.

I understand, don't get me wrong, 99% of stuff in crypto is hot garbage, but having a global database that isn't controlled by any one (or even dozen) entities is pretty powerful. The 2 guys that started farcaster could quit, or get hit by a bus, or decide it's not profitable enough and pivot, but at least you have control over your profile still. If reddit was decentralized more, they wouldn't be able to shut down their APIs for 3rd party clients.

Trust me I understand the criticism of block chains, but if we want open source and the internet to thrive and not be controlled by companies, we need a global layer that is neutral.

Those are different design choices that have different trade offs, I didn't make these decisions, I'm just explaining how it is