Your Car Is Spying on You for Insurance Companies
Your Car Is Spying on You for Insurance Companies
It turns out that the “Internet of Things” is full of automated snoops and spies. Data collection, now integrated into new car designs, is more pervasive than ever and is ushering in a brave new world of surveillance and corporate collusion.
It turns out that the “Internet of Things” is full of automated snoops and spies. Data collection, now integrated into new car designs, is more pervasive than ever and is ushering in a brave new world of surveillance and corporate collusion.
She also pointed out that “Between 2019 and 2022, Tesla employees internally circulated intimate footage collected from people’s private cars for their own amusement, according to reports.”
But you can definitely trust Musk to put a chip in your head...
Imagine buying into such an ecosystem that's embedded in you just to get the email "we've changed! Here's what you should know! Pricing will change from x to y" etc along with all other stupid shit
Gonna be some eternal sunshine type shit with weirdos masturbating to your stream of consciousness (against TOS of course)
Imagine being late in the subscription cost. O_o
My next car will probably be a 1986 Ford Bronco with an EV conversion and zero network connectivity. Just a hunk of 4x4 steel with a ton (literally) of batteries under the hood.
Well an EV conversion would be the only way to get one of those out of its own way. There's a reason OJ's bronco chase was so slow... My ex insisted we get a mid 80's bronco, and it was so bad. I think it averaged about 6mpg and good god it was laughably anemic. If it was me, I would look for a early 70's or late 70's bronco. Totally different styles for each, but still better than the mid 80's anything.
I think OJ single handedly killed the Bronco as a car anyone with self-respect would own.
The image of that white Bronco rolling down the highway in the slow lane with a long procession of cop cars behind in second gear was one of the most iconic images of the 90s. You couldn't have picked a worse getaway car.
Sure! We can insure that for you! Oh we just noticed that our InsureLink service isn't connecting to your car. So I'll just need you to sign this waiver saying that you're declining the InsureLink Safety discount. Just sign right here. It's just saying that we cannot offer you all of our insurance services, just like if you get in an accident or something and we can't remotely verify what you were doing at the time, we can't help you. Great! And without the Safety discount your premiums will go up by only 372.50 a month.
Have you considered the International Harvester Scout?
Mine is a few years too old to do that. Once my car is no longer working I'll be putting around on my ebike instead
Fuck yeah!
Also, here's shameless plug for !micromobility@lemmy.world
In the US, your car manufacturer might have a Do Not Sell My Information request form on their website. Not sure how effective it is, but it's worth trying.
That's the thing that's funny about this.
Some auto brands would ignore it, and some might actually take these requests seriously due to the legal ramifications if they don't.
Even if they ignored it, how would you know?
What will be interesting is what the reaction will be when geeks figure out how to firewall their cars.
Please disable your firewall to be able to access the car steering features.
Just uh, ride a bike (or buy an old car I guess, but bikes are more fun and good exercise)
It can't spy on me if it doesn't exist.
When can we start open sourcing cars?
There's gotta be a way to disable telemetry. My first thought is to cut whatever antenna is used to transmit your data to the corporation. It could be the same antenna used for radio, but I'd go without radio in a heartbeat if it meant Ford, Chevy, or whoever can't spy on me in a car I paid $15,000+ for.
Of course, we shouldn't have to do this. My first choice is to not give any of these car companies a dime of my money, but literally every single brand is doing it. This disgusting trend of spying on people should be illegal. It's rapist behavior.
In related news, the DoJ are suing Apple because car manufacturers can’t extract Tracking data out of people’s iPhones.
This isn't even remotely true. This is specifically what the DOJ is suing over: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39780312
CarPlay access is also included in the Lawsuit.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/21/24107976/apple-carplay-doj-lawsuit-anticompetitive-digital-key
GM are discontinuing CarPlay integration because they couldn’t reach an agreement with Apple over user data.
GM have been busted selling OnStar data to insurance companies for money.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/22/technology/gm-onstar-driver-data.html
Tracking individuals and selling their data is very lucrative and Automotive Manufacturers are trying to find income streams to subsidise EV sales. Apple and (to a lesser extent) Google have been protecting users data.
Porsche recently allowed Android Auto on their CarPlay-compatible headunits after negotiating with Google over owners privacy concerns.