MRI machines need thousands of liters of liquid helium to function. Health care workers say they can’t afford any disruptions to the helium supply chain.
Privatizing the US national helium reserve. Gonna laugh when in a few years the government of another nation ends up owning it. Helium is dwindling finite resource that key technological infrastructure relies upon.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
Literally what happened to a friend of mine. He was in a bookshop and only had enough money to buy Fellowship or Atlas Shrugged and chose Fellowship because he'd be able to buy a soda with the change.
In the broad strokes absolutely, in the detail hell no. I had to learn linguistic theories and botany to get to the bottom of everything going on in the books
The Hobbit is a kids' book, but I'm not sure I'd say Lord of the Rings is childish. There are childish things about it, for sure. The black-and-white Christian morality and "good monarch" stuff, for example. But it's a serious work of literature at the same time.
The fact that humans make mistakes doesn't change that there are right and wrong things to do. LOTR shows lots of the former, and it showing the latter doesn't make it childish.
and “good monarch” stuff
Since that "good monarch"'s good traits were about not breaking things that work and fixing things that don't work, I think it was an intentional utopian picture. Sort of king Canute the way he is sometimes portrayed.
Despotism is not a useful political term at all and feudalism is a very specific form of a much broader economic system that was used in the middle ages. You have nonides what you're talking about.
Despotism refers to a person in power making unilateral decisions,
Yeah, that too, so?
it is no means of describing any system of government.
Why is that?
Define communism, I’ll let you once again look it up.
Why would I? That wouldn't change that I'm right. You seem to think that I have to prove something or dispute something with you to be right. I don't.
Also a hint - anybody can come up with any kind of definition. If I look it up, then what? Somebody you consider authoritative has approved a definition? Well, it's one model you like, I may not, so why would I bother?
Despotism is an absolute monarchy where technically there's only one free man, the monarch, and all the subjects, including nobles or whatever, are his property. There's no contracts or something to this. The monarch's power is delegated as they wish to the state apparatus of whatever kind they choose. That'd be Russia since Peter or, say, Safavid Persia, and frankly a few German states in the new age despite sporting feudal symbolic.
Feudalism is a system of vassal-suzerain and allied relationships, contractual and not even that centralized, as a feudal entity can even be vassal to multiple other entities (games like CK get this wrong, which makes, say, Denmark there less fun than it was) and have its own various contractual ties. With feudalism every person's status is complex, there are individual privileges and obligations to every entity.
Feudalism is much more sophisticated than a despotic monarchy. IMHO it's the main reason Europeans dominate this planet.
EDIT: By the way, Decembrists paid a lot of attention to that difference, if we get back to Russian history.
feudal contracts literally don't exist they're a made up justification of the feudal system that was exposed as false in 1789 when the french peasants found no such things in the manors of their lords
IMHO it's the main reason Europeans dominate this planet
feudalism is not at all a unique phenomenon to europe. you say you get this from Crusader Kings, babe look at the rest of the crusader kings map. africans and middle eastern people did that too
i'm sure it's just a wild coincidence that syrians & latins in the crusades didn't think their forms of government were different, but i realize i'm talking to someone that's not read a single primary source for what they are oh-so-knowledgable about
ah yeah its a contractual superior system to "despotism" that's distinct because it has contracts. "who do those contracts apply to?" "less than 1% of the population"
and if you're so sure they're this defining characteristic of a whole economic system and epoch, present them to me
Tbh I'd feel pretty owned if someone implied I was any kind of esoteric political Catholic. Integralist, distributivist, clerical fascist, mexican synarchist, etc. Each one would feel like an own
I'm dying to hear you define any of these terms you're using. Please, open the window up to world of politics so incoherent it's like staring at an eldritch horror from beyond the veil of reality.
Lol literally doing the "I know what you are, but what am I?"
I hope you're a teenager who will one day grow to look back on this and realise how cringe they were, because if you're a full-grown adult
I'm pretty stupid, but for what you claim my intelligence would have to be negative. It'd have to be some kind of "antimatter intelligence", and your political alignment is the closest to inventing that.
Actually it's interesting, for whatever reason growing up I always associated farts with communists. Not all of them, only Stalinists/tankies/"red-browns". Possibly has something to do with older people with unhealthy digestion talking about that in kindergarten and school.
How can you be this confident in talking out of your ass?
Also how can you be this shitty at using bs rhetorical techniques? You were asked to define "imperial core" not name "what is the capital of Russia?" You're trying to detail the discussion, but you're so dumb you can't do it properly.