What’s next for Mozilla?
What’s next for Mozilla?
For the longest time, Mozilla was synonymous with the Firefox browser, but for the last few years, Mozilla has started to look beyond Firefox, especially
one passage of note:
Where does all of this leave the Firefox browser. Surman argued that the organization is very judicious about rolling AI into the browser — but he also believes that AI will become part of everything Mozilla does. “We want to implement AI in a way that’s trustworthy and benefits people,” he said. Fakespot is one example of this, but the overall vision is larger. “I think that’s what you’ll see from us, over the course of the next year, is how do you use the browser as the thing that represents you and how do you build AI into the browser that’s basically on your side as you move through the internet?” He noted that an Edge-like chatbot in a sidebar could be one way of doing this, but he seems to be thinking more in terms of an assistant that helps you summarize articles and maybe notify you proactively. “I think you’ll see the browser evolve. In our case, that’s to be more protective of you and more helpful to you. I think it’s more that you use the predictive and synthesizing capabilities of those tools to make it easier and safer to move through the internet.”
What an absolute shitshow this is going to be. If I want a digital assistant, I'll get one. Keeping concerns separate is what has always worked. This reads like Elon wanting X to be the "everything app". That ship has already sailed. The web is the everything app. Back when the web was new, you had AOL and Yahoo wanting to be the "gateway" to everything. How did that work out? My gateway to everything is my bookmarks folder. I don't want AI in anything I use locally unless I explicitly enable it and ask for assistance. IMHO, this is the reason so many digital assistants have failed (especially Microsoft's); because they tried to anticipate your needs rather than STFU and stay out of the way.
I'm old.
/rant
My feeling is that AI is the new solution looking for too many problems to solve. I had the same feeling with microservices, big data, block chain, NoSQL databases and all those other hype driven development things. Different products and solutions exist to solve their respective problems. I notice that AI (notably since ChatGPT and related) are pushed in all directions.
I'm absolutely with you. Having run face-first into MongoDB more than once, I finally learned not to trust the hype around these things.
The Gartner hype cycle strikes again.
Isn't Firefox generally quite good at letting you turn off features you don't want?
That's not my problem personally. It's that they're wasting time on stuff like this when they could be spending it on enhancing their browser in other ways
Something something "Looking Glass"
Say it with me now: local AI, local AI... or fuck off.
That being said, ARM laptops and probably even workstations are the future, and so is RISC-V. I suspect we'll see more tensor cores or AI related processing built-in to the SoC's.
If it's then only a question of hardware enablement and a software companion to go along with it, I'm all for it.
Go Mozilla...! But again: local AI, or fuck off.
The use local models for Firefox Translations so I would expect they would do something similar
I mean, so far their most recent attempt at AI is a local AI based on PrivateGPT called MemoryCache.
I've been hopeful for an external hardware device, something akin to MythicAI's analog hardware. It essentially offloads the heavy duty work done by the GPU, with far lower power consumption and about 98-99% accuracy, then sends the output data back to the computer to be digitized. Adding more tensor cores is just making more power consumption which is already an issue.
That company in particular was using this method for real time AI tracking in cameras but I feel like it could be easily adapted to effectively eliminate the work in AI that NVIDIA is doing for GPU's. Why brute force AI with power and tensor cores when a couple wires and some voltage can sift through the same or larger models at the same.or faster speeds with, well okay about 98-99% accuracy. It could be a simple hardware attachment via PCIe or hell even USB with a small bottleneck for conversion times. I just used an app to upscale a photo locally on my phone, took about 14m (Xperia 1IV), I could easily have offloaded that work to an analog AI device. We are nearly to the point where we can just run "AI*" on a phone at nearly PC speeds.
All this to say - local AI indeed. The only way AI works is when everyone has access to it. Give full, free access to everybody and the fear of corporate interference drops drastically. There are plenty of models available online not made by Google or Microsoft pushing whatever or harvesting data back (remember to firewall your programs if you run them locally). Ideally tagsets could be open sourced but in the capitalist world I could also see independent artists selling models of their work under a license
/* Of course, AI as a broad spectrum term encompassing model based projects, LLM's for assistants & generative imaging, and not the actual AI as a semi-autonomous intelligence
Neuromorphic hardware seems to be best suited as an extension of RAM storage. It doesn't need to use the DAC/ADC approach of Mythic AI, some versions are compatible with a CMOS process, and could be either integrated directly into the processor, maybe as an extension of the cache or a dedicated neural processing module, or into RAM modules.
It's pretty clear that current NN processing solutions, by repurposing existing hardware, are bound to get replaced by dedicated hardware with a fraction of the power requirements and orders of magnitude larger processing capabilities.
Once some popular use cases for large NNs have been successfully proven, we can expect future hardware to come with support for them, so it also makes sense to make plans for software that can use them. And yes, local AI... and possibly trainable locally.
The vast majority of consumer devices, both mobile and laptops/desktops, are not powerful enough to run local AI with a good user experience yet, and even if they were, a lot of users would still prefer having it run in the cloud rather than using up their phone battery
Local by default, option to go remote. Even the privacy-first types might want to offload that to a more powerful local machine.
They could even sell access to a Mozilla provided AI server like they do with the VPN service.
Maybe some "Folding@Home" kind of thing, to offload public AI projects. I.e decentralised processing.
Yes, an ai assistant is that all it needs. And higher salaries to the c suite please. Also it needs to remove feature and ignore user requests
I am worried about the direction of Mozilla, it VERY FUCKING MUCH needs to invest on the browser instead of wasting time on "AI"
The conspiracy theory I've heard is that Mozilla is basically paid opposition to Google. Their leadership is being paid (by Google) to run Firefox into the ground without actually going out of business.
Whats wrong with firefox currently?
Their CEO is the biggest symptom of their problem. She demands a sky high compensation despite her poor leadership. The company has been in a spiraling decline for the past decade now. Instead of focusing on bringing a great user experience, they alienated their most staunch users with things like Pocket and allowed PWAs and Electron to eat their lunch.
It's kinda crazy to me how hate-filled Lemmy is just a half-year after I joined (when it felt like a breath of fresh air after deleting my Reddit account), especially for Mozilla. Mozilla has issues, but it's nothing they can't fix or come out of. They don't deserve to die. And all the conspiracy theories I'm reading is just nonsense. I happen to be a Firefox user, but really it's mainly because Google decided to screw with user choice (i.e. Manifest v3). Firefox is still FOSS, and it's still giving plenty of user choice.
And all this AI talk is just bandwagoning by every corporation because if AI (as in LLM and whatnot) happens to be a baseline thing for many corporations, Mozilla not implementing it could backfire for them, so while it is bandwagoning, it also makes sense to hedge one's bets on it.
I, for one, think this current notion of AI is too raw to take any real shape (outside of the current novelty), and these corps that are jumping on it, just like they did with "web 2.0" and "big data" and "the cloud" and "blockchain", will eventually find that while there is some tangibility to be found, it will take many years to solidify into products that make sense for a consumer.
Yeah and AI is pretty useful for doing certain things. For example my pixel can turn on subtitles for any video or audio playing and even translate it for me on the fly. AI isnt blockchain and it isnt all chatgtp or making images with too many fingers. People are talking about improving web standards as if whatever ai stuff google,MS, and apple are cooking up wont be used in order to enhance various web features.
Likewise firefox is currently a good browser and does keep up for the most part. I'd understand the criticisms if firefox was suck in 2009, but modern day firefox is fast and works well and they will likely continue keeping up with standards while an independent team works on the open source AI stuff
Yep, exactly. Firefox does what it sets out to do -- be a FOSS alternative to the ever-growing corporate browser market, providing user choice and useful features.
And I agree that AI as both a concept and implementation in its various types and forms will continue to be iterated upon and will continue to show numerous useful applications. I only hesitate that what is being called AI at this moment as being some kind of groundbreaking thing that changes the world, like corporations seem to be making it out as (hence the bandwagon to try to cash in on it).
It may very well change the world in the near future, but it's not quite there yet. It is novel, and it is cool what ChatGPT and other applications can do, such as the example you gave, and that does have a very tangible quality to it. I feel that any fast-moving technological pace must be met with trust and with objective science every step of the way, and the likes of ChatGPT and other AI models have quite a ways to go -- especially concerning trust.
I personally just don't like people calling it AI. It's not.
I happen to be a Firefox user
I happen to be a former
conkeroruser, which was based on XULRunner, which Mozilla dropped, just like other ways to use their engine for other browsers.But I could use pre-Australis Firefox.
Only then their experiments on people with UI design happened.
And yes, Mozilla as an organization has objective flaws. Their treatment of the SeaMonkey project (now separate) has not been good as well.
It's kinda crazy to me how hate-filled Lemmy is just a half-year after I joined (when it felt like a breath of fresh air after deleting my Reddit account), especially for Mozilla.
I realized after diving into this niche that depending on who you follow that's exactly how people behave. I had to stop following @jwz because it's only hate and negativity all the time. I have this exact same feeling on Mastodon.
Let's face it, we lost the fun, early web long time ago. It was all taken over by corporations and when Mozilla dies (and that's not if) they will finish locking it up and the only way to browse it will be by using official, ad filled tools. Best thing we can do is to prepare ourselves for the world without web (www?). We'll still have apps and communicators and of course will still use websites at work but the days of 'browsing' will soon (well, hopefully not very soon) be over.
Higher exec salaries.
Pretty much.. Mitchell baker gets paid 7 million.
That being said though, just to play devils advocate, she was there since the beginning apparently (at Netscape). So, she actually seems to somewhat deserve it. And she's well educated too and I get the impression she's also a good person too
Whereas, you look at the Oracle CEO, and she's what you expect (donates a lot of money to the right wing, banker, etc)
I can definitely get behind an AI plugin that reliably rats out AI generated content; i will love that in my browser (as long as it, sigh, is not a privacy nightmare). But all the "be smart for me" digital assistants can go eff themselves. I don't even use auto mode on my camera.
Can we please focus on actual user experience?
Firefox is the only major browser without HDR support on Windows...
I mean HDR support in Windows, at least in my anecdotal experience, is garbage, anyway. But I agree, that doesn't mean the browser shouldn't support it by now.
Can I get a browser that would automatically filter out AI generated content? That would be a killer feature!!
Hopefully a new CEO with better vision and ability to execute. Mozilla’s leadership is a joke.
One of the few remaining browsers in 2024 that does not support profile switching (and no, a debug
about:profilespage does not count as supporting profile switching), and sure, AI is absolutely what it needs right now to become relevant. /sAre you talking about this? Because it exists since ~2016
Unfortunately not, that doesn't meet the needs for either a different user, or a completely different use case. For example, I want to completely separate my work profile with a set of extensions, and my personal profile with a completely different theme and set of extensions. In most other browsers you simply click on your profile picture and choose "Switch Profiles" or something. Not Firefox nor its derivatives.
Bro, Mozilla needs to die. They don't deserve all the money they are getting.
Yes, let's let Google have complete control over the web, that will show them!
The majority of the opensource community won't rally behind any browser other than Firefox or one of its soft forks. Firefox is alive by virtue of being the only fully opensource alternative to Chromium with a different webengine. If Firefox and Mozilla died, these are the possible outcomes I see:
- Majority of FF users jump to Chromium and never jump back, Chromium becomes the only opensource browser the majority knows of
- government does absolutely nothing and that's that
- government (most likely EU) decides to do something like
- start developing their own browser
- fund a firefox fork or another opensource alternative
- take away chromium from google due to the marketshare (now a monopoly)
- FF users and devs disperse to either
- pick some Firefox soft fork to make that the new FF, a new foundation is established focused solely on the browser
- start a new browser from scratch with a new foundation focused solely on the browser
- a new browser is started that Google then pays to act as the new excuse not to have Chromium taken away from them due to being a monopoly (aka we're back at square 1)
Except the first option where the government does fuck all and a new Mozilla+Firefox clone, it sounds like a win to me. No?
- Majority of FF users jump to Chromium and never jump back, Chromium becomes the only opensource browser the majority knows of
Literally the worst take I've heard all day
what does that creative commons license have to do with Firefox?
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
Over the last few years, Mozilla also started making startup investments, including into Mastodon’s client Mammoth, for example, and acquired Fakespot, a website and browser extension that helps users identify fake reviews.
Indeed, when Mozilla launched its annual report a few weeks ago, it also used that moment to add a number of new members to its board — the majority of which focus on AI.
Surman told me that the leadership team had been planning these efforts for almost a year, but as public interest in AI grew, he “pushed it out of the door.” But then Draief pretty much moved it right back into stealth mode to focus on what to do next.
Surman believes that no matter the details of that, though, the overall principles of transparency and freedom to study the code, modify it and redistribute it will remain key.
The licenses aren’t perfect and we are going to do a bunch of work in the first half of next year with some of the other open source projects around clarifying some of those definitions and giving people some mental models.”
Then, he noted, when the smartphone arrived, there were a few smaller projects that aimed to create alternatives, including Mozilla (and at its core, Android is obviously also open source, even as Google and others have built walled gardens around the actual user experience).
Saved 82% of original text.
maybe make google search not only default but the only search? cash in more money for the managing board? ooooor kill another function users loved? so many opportunities to worsen the product - I'm sure they will find sth.