UTF-8? Anyone?
107 0 ReplyBeyoncé
114 0 ReplySo... UTF-8 interpreted as ISO-8859-1? You have failed Unicode college >:(
33 1 Reply
Sorry, no, but I can support it in UTF-16.
16 0 ReplyMaybe she was sick of trying to get a terminal displaying utf correctly.
12 0 ReplySo... she's running DD-WRT :P
5 0 Reply
UTF-8 Random anyone?
5 0 ReplySecurity bad.
2 5 ReplyMyths.
6 0 Reply
What did i just read
54 1 ReplyYeah I think I'm OOTL, can someone explain?
30 1 ReplyI think the simulation is broken again.
17 0 Reply
Wait Beyonce is a blonde white woman now? Is this what they mean when they say “it’s a different kind of white?”
45 2 ReplyIt's just skin tone, with the right lighting and color grading we all just look like people
1 0 Reply
0-255 was good enough for me an my grandpappy.
36 2 Reply0-127, top bit is always 0.
28 1 Replyi thought the top bit was originally 0 or 1 depending on the evilness/odiousness of the rest of the number, as a parity check.
6 0 ReplyDamn big-endians always looking down on the rest of us.
4 0 Reply
Just like pokemon
4 0 Reply
Good ol'
Alt
+1``3``0
.I guess Beyonce has no love for Extended ASCII.
16 0 Replyor AltGr + ' + e I love this shortcut
2 0 ReplyCompose
e
’
2 0 Reply
She must be running out of ideas.
17 2 ReplyYou've been able to do diacritical marks with ASCII for over thirty years. It's already standard. alt+0233
13 2 Replydunno if it's the same character but alt+130 has been firmly drilled into my brain from my entire Pokémon childhood.
3 0 Reply
Yeah let's drop wide characters, it was a bad idea. Let's simplify.. also let's convert all porn back to ASCII art.
6 0 ReplyBey-once
5 0 ReplyShe's like the opposite of Prince
3 0 ReplyThat symbol has a unicode, "The Love Symbol"
1 0 ReplyNot true.
the Prince symbol is not eligible for inclusion in Unicode, which “does not encode personal characters, nor does it encode logos.”
Source: https://parkerhiggins.net/2013/01/writing-the-prince-symbol-in-unicode/
5 0 Reply
I want to join the C-hive
2 0 Reply...what? To support ASCII...? I'm confused. Isn't ASCII literally made for those kinds of letters?
1 0 Reply3 4 Replyright wing?
4 0 Reply