My fellow liberals, Mussolini wasn’t voted into power.
Mussolini was literally invited into power to “restore order” by the liberals themselves because they didn’t know how to deal with the communists taking over the country.
Mussolini’s fascism was the first successful test case of a liberal experiment to brutally crush Leninism in Europe following the Bolshevik Revolution. Hitler followed in Mussolini’s footsteps.
Even funnier, Mussolini was invited into power by the litteral King of Italy, in a move that liberal historians are still struggling to describe in a way that doesn't mention "class interest of the aristocracy"
I definitely remember the whole "We're gonna burn this down if Trump was elected" momentum quickly turn to "We meant figuratively" and then "That means voting!"
There's a big reason why I have grown distant from some of my friends and family and it's basically that I know I can't trust them anymore
More interested in keeping the peace than anything else
There's a big reason why I have grown distant from some of my friends and family and it's basically that I know I can't trust them anymore
I'd felt something similar for a while and I couldn't put my finger on it. They all claimed to see the fascist rot and then they stuffed the genie right back into the bottle. You're right, the trust is just gone.
Liberals be like: "Revolution is a deranged fantasy for violent weirdos. We have to rely on the system in order to make things better. Even though the system will only ever result in fascist outcomes but it's okay because this guy is only 98% fascist unlike the 100% fascist competitor.
vote for Mussolini as harm reduction then take up arms against him
????
I suppose what this person means is that you can vote for a right-wing candidate and then pressure him to do things that might be considered left-wing or something like that. But the problem is that Democratic voters aren't going to do that, except for a few groups of people. Most Democratic politicians win elections simply because they are not Republicans, and as such, when they are elected to office, they do nothing useful.
"mister Mussolini you deserve to be shot directly in the head but I will do my faithful duty to ritually prostrate myself at the voting booth in your honor"
Bravely voting for the guy who will immediately and enthusiasticly adopt the policies of the guy he didn't vote for is actually a very good analogy for voting for the Dems.
I literally just had a lib admit in a recent thread that his voting for Biden was a vote for "genocide" and they justified it because it made them feel safer than Trump's hypothetical 'worse genocide'. Then someone else chimed in support by saying that they would 'happily wash their hands in Palestinian blood' to protect reproductive rights in the US—which were lost anyway.
Even reading that, I'm still not 100% confident the op quote isn't good satire and the rest is an act to get that quote off. Like this one-liner gets the point across better than basically any shit I've seen anywhere. Unbelievable that he just came up with that banger while seriously believing it.
Deciding that Musollini was like, a morally superior guy to Hitler is absurd. Hitler managed to do worse things but it's not like Musollini had the opportunity to do a holocaust and said 'no, that's a step too far for me, personally'. This is your brain on liberalized Great Man theory. It's applying pop psychology to a perfect sphere in a perfect vacuum. Fucking dolts
He kinda decided not to do a Jewish killing until it was a problem between him and Hitler, I have heard, but he also killed enough other people it doesn't fucking matter, plus at the end of the day he did do it
these people yelled for four years how Trump was the end of democracy but in even the most extreme hypothetical they cannot conceive that democracy might be dead as long as the ritual of voting for one of exactly two options is preserved.
They can be inconsistent with their use of democracy because their conception of democracy is empty and purely formal and abstract. So it is easy for them to reinterpret political reality as 'still democratic' at the moment because their conception is very empty and has therefore relatively little to do with concrete, substantive democracy.
Also because Trump in no way upset the material basis which they actually use to decide if there is democracy or not, namely whether or not the capitalist class whose views they express and interests they support saw their class power undermined, which of course they did not under Trump.
To give an example of this: I was unfortunately in a conversation with a bourgeois liberal the other say, and they said that Russia is a 'totalitarian society'. I asked why they thought that, instead of simply saying that it is a fairly authoritarian nationalist state with a form of highly state-directed capitalism, and they said that it is because they apparently 'use arbitrary political power to violate private property'. Which is not only a bizarre criterion for totalitarianism, but also revealed how liberals think about political and social freedom and democracy.
Okay, it sucks that Hitler's ghost is the only candidate but what are you going to do - not vote? That's basically the same as a vote for Hitler's ghost!