Skip Navigation
the_dunk_tank @hexbear.net iridaniotter [she/her] @hexbear.net
NSFW Locked

[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art

https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857

No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.

213

You're viewing a single thread.

213 comments

  • always strange to me when people start trying to talk about bestiality like it's a real moral question and not just a fantasy fetish.

    real people don't actually do that, 99.9999% of allegations are literally just made up, even an anonymous essay about why someone should be allowed to fuck a dog, that's someone writing themed smut it's not moral philosophy. the only academically interesting thing about bestiality is why it's had cultural purchase in myth, rumour, and storytelling for thousands of years.

    • Uh unfortunately that's not true, people do actually fuck animals and have since time immemorial probably. Just this year there was a case in my country where they're prosecuting a dude that sexually assaulted his dogs and filmed it.

      Also being a dumb teenager with unrestricted internet access in the early 2000's, I've seen stuff I would have preferred not to.

      • i'm not saying nobody has ever done bestiality but the rare un-faked examples have to be extraordinarily rare. like all the animals people talk about it with, besides like sheep are dangerous and these people would be assaulting them, probably while naked. no fucking way people manage to do that at any appreciable rate.

        but there's a lot of fictional depictions of bestiality, a million lurid rumors and taboo tales. makes you think it's more common & possible than it is, but there simply never were 'donkey shows' or bestiality executions in ancient rome.

        • I happen to have a textbook that has some citations for the incidence.

          Kinsey and colleagues found 8% of men and 3% of women did it at least once, and 17% of men raised on a farm (all self reported). This was in the 50s, but more recent studies have also found that a fair number of people have done it at least once. The large majority only did it once or a few times, often as a dare, initiation, or out of curiosity. And clinical zoophilia (where it's the primary means of arousal) is extremely rare and usually has a lot of comorbidities.

          It doesn't happen often, clearly, but the research we have suggests that it's common enough to where you almost certainly have met someone who has done it.

        • but there's a lot of fictional depictions of bestiality, a million lurid rumors and taboo tales. makes you think it's more common & possible than it is, but there simply never were 'donkey shows' or bestiality executions in ancient rome.

          You, uh, got like any evidence to support a negative?

          • there needs to be evidence of donkey shows, evidence of welsh people fucking sheep, evidence of Catherine laying a horse, and evidence of coliseum bestiality, before i should take any of that seriously

            • evidence of donkey show

              you mean like multiple textual sources? You're not going to find photos of it.

              • You're not going to find photos of it

                gee i wonder why, despite cameras existing the entirety of their alleged existence? i'm being assured there's loads of video and camera evidence for every other bestiality so why would this be different

                • Rome predates cameras

                  • you specifically highlighted donkey shows, i was answering that jfc

                    but feel free to explain to me how a fucking giraffe could possibly fuck a human. just the geometry of that

                    • Sorry, I was thinking this was also about Rome because I had read about them using donkey sex as a form of torture/execution/entertainment, and forgot it was also supposed to have happened in the modern era. Mea Culpa

                    • I'd like to introduce you to a fellow named Mr. Hands

                      • i can't believe i'm actually having to explain that shipping a giraffe to Rome from Elephantine, then somehow training it to fuck anything, then somehow ?suspending? an unwilling participant and executing them with that giraffe is an unbelievable series of events

    • Literally everything, even the most baby brained shit, you should ask why we do or do not do it. If you don't have an answer past "because it's wrong" you don't have a set of ethics and morals, just gut impulses and whatever you were taught was normal growing up.

      • Because if you’re too undesirable to fuck your fellow species, you don’t get to just move on to the next species. You either fuck a non-living sex toy produced in a factory or don’t fuck anything and live with it.

        Also there has not been a single normal human being who’s been exposed for bestiality. Usually they’re serial killers, abusers, pedophiles, and so on. So not a lot of good representatives in the Animal Sex Having population

        • Your first argument is restating the concept, not presenting why it is wrong. It's tautological. Actually it's a little worse than tautological, it sneaks in a motive. If someone was desirable and had sex with humans, would it be okay? I don't think you or I think that.

          Your second is also not an argument.

      • my answer to bestiality would be "because you can't" animals won't fuck you and they'll probably kill you if you try to fuck them.

        • uhhhh that's just (unfortunately) very well-documented to be false. like, extremely well documented.

          edit: also that's an incomprehensible answer to the question. why would something being impossible make it wrong? I don't think it would be morally wrong to sidestep through the 8th dimension to get to work faster

          • I don’t think it would be morally wrong to sidestep through the 8th dimension to get to work faster

            I recently had an argument with my boss when something similar was said, so they would steal even more of your labour.

          • i guarantee someone would have a moral stance against teleportation if it existed. but it doesn't so i don't very much care to speculate.

            but handfuls of unverified and whispered-about videos doesn't constitute 'extreme' documentation, i'd welcome an actual study proving there's more than dozens of actual bestia--uh--tists? and a widespread occurrence of the act, but i know of no such studies and no opinions on it that aren't painted by the cultural baggage attached

            it's akin to people wingsuit flying through a suspension bridge and getting cheese-grated, there's certainly footage of it and it was a bad idea but i don't think it's a very pressing concern for most people

            • so, bestiality is wrong because you can't do it, in other words it's impossible. therefore the people who have done it on video are evil because they're doing something impossible. huey-wut

              • my op was 99.99%, that is not absolute, i was never making an absolute rule, my claim is that discourses about bestiality are mostly talking about the imaginary and fetishes but failing to recognize that. the article/tweet we're talking about is a thinly disguised sexual fantasy with no interface with material reality. and people itt are conflating that with the extraordinarily rare real world acts, that are nothing like that sexual fantasy.

                in the 'article' they're imagining a consensual sexual relationship with a dog, which the dog consents to. this is impossible not just from a dog's faculty to consent, but because dogs do not experience sexual attraction to humans. if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something. it's not a real argument or a real situation, and i think it's silly when people give it the airs of a moral debate

                • if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt

                  ok, so you're just talking from a position of ignorance. when i say this is extremely well-documented, i mean that there used to be a subreddit called /r/sexwithdogs where people were posting hundreds of videos of precisely this.

                  it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something

                  this is true, yeah, you have to groom animals for stuff like this, just like any other vulnerable party.

                • if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something.

                  When I was growing up, we had a family dog that was constantly humping legs. This isn't a defense, mind, since "but they made the first move" isn't any more justifiable with animals than it is with children, but it does happen.

                  • i think it's a long way from leg-hump (which isn't sexual in all situations, it's often about dominance) to fucking an animal with incompatible morphology, wrong pheromones, and incorrect behavior

                • you've never seen a dog hump someone's leg?

        • First, right off the bat, you can and I've seen it. With that out of the way, you're not addressing if it is moral or not. Morality is about what it is right or wrong to do, not what is possible to do. If I could, with a sweep of my hand, either kill every poor person in the US or slaughter every millionaire, then there is a moral reason why I should perform the latter and not the former.

    • always strange to me when people start trying to talk about bestiality like it's a real moral question

      everything can be a moral question, how is that hard to understand?

      you don't have to have a bestiality fetish to think about the morality of it lmao

You've viewed 213 comments.