I mean...

Comments full of people earnestly trying to solve the problem without breaking the law lol

you have the knife, ‘equally’ means you get all the apples

Just cut them right down the middle. Four slices each person takes one and the last is left to rot. It says share equally not share the entire apple

shouldn't be that hard, but I understand that 94% can't do it.
line up the apples, a line that will cut the first apple into 2/3 vs 1/3 will also cut the next apple in same proportion. 1 person gets the 2 sliced 1/3s
- You forgot about the cores.
  Cores are non edible volume so you probably need to cut closer to 68-70%.
- Stack the apples on top of each other, and proceed to do a single spiral cut down from the top stem, out towards the edge, and then back to the center in a single fluid motion. It won't solve the problem, but it'll look damn cool
  
  Actually, if you can peel them both with o e stroke, you cwn make apple sauce and serve eqaul portions quite easily.

Cut both apples into 10 slices each. And then, the richest person takes 18 slices. Because that's how capitalism works, baby.

Because the 6% are psychopaths capable of murder. I thought it was closer to 3% of the population though

cut one in half. then take turns each taking an equally sized bite
- Bite bite pass
- If you cut one in half then the two survivors get one whole apple each.

My solution is cut both apples in half, and take two halves, because I am more equal than others.
- Some animals are more equal than others...

Line em up and cut a third off both apples in one go? Everyone gets 2/3? Seems simple right? Consider the core. I don't think it's possible if you consider the core. You have to kill one of your friends.
You have to kill one of your friends.
You have to kill one of your friends.
Choose which one of your friends to kill.
Reach for the knife before someone else does.
You have to kill one of your friends.
- Michael: See, the trolley problem forces you to choose between two versions of letting other people die. And the actual solution is very simple. Sacrifice yourself.
  -- The Good Place
- Killing one of your friends might not be the optimal solution.
  But one of your friends might think it is.
- Cut 1/3 up from the top or bottom?
  (the apples! Cut the apples!)
- Rotate each apple 90 degrees so that core is parallel to the ground and perpendicular to the knife, now its split equally
  If more than one person hates the stem part then yea it's murder time
  
  The core isn't evenly distributed along the axis though, it's like a small thingy in the center. Definitely murder time
- Or you could sacrifice yourself, you murderous bastard.
  
  But then I would be dead.

Cut both apples in half. One half for the blonde, one half for brownie, one half for the ginger, and the last half for the animals or something.
- Last half for the painter of this picture.
  
  :D

Just eat out the apples together, ignoring the knife. Just take a bite and pass the apple to the next person, repeating the process until there is just a core. Not very sanitary, but mission accomplished.

I will be the cpt obv
1/3 1/3
<=======]==o
2/3 2/3
- Ok but like how do you know it's 1/3 of the apple without any other tools.
  
  You don't, you only know it's possible to do so thanks to the Ham sandwich theorem
  
  What's funny is that you've actually stumbled onto an entire problem that's studied quite heavily. I remembered a Numberphile video about this. The problem is called "envy-free cake splitting". It's pretty straightforward. A split is envy-free if no one believes someone else got more than them. For three people this was figured out in 1960 and you can read about it here. It has been solved for N participants as well and you can read about the general problem here.
  For two people, it's obvious. One splits and one chooses. The first person is incentivized to make it even because they don't know which they'll get.
  I was going to give a summary of the process for three people but it's too much to explain succinctly. Just check the article I posted lol.
  
  Let’s not go too deep on this alright
  
  Cut first, choose last. It's as fair as you can get when eyeballing it
  
  it is a magical long sword of apple slicing (+5 damage and THAC0 against apples, +1 otherwise)

If you have one guy draw the knife over a long surface and distance, the other two can use that one slicing motion to cut the apples any number of times.
ONE STROKE, 99 cuts!
- I got 99 cuts, but a stroke ain't one
- ONE STROKE, 99 cuts!
  Like shaving with an old razor blade.

And you have one less rival for getting a girlfriend.
- Is there a Bechdel test but for incel men?
  
  https://xkcd.com/322/

I get the apple with the leaf for solving the puzzle.

Ah damn it's one of those single-use knives.
- Only if you didn't bring extra knife ammo
  
  It's one of those shivs from the last of us
- That's why you get the knife subscription plan.
  
  Don't give them any more ideas.
  
  Yeah fuck buying things for life - I am now buying things for death
- Cross contamination there's a girl there you'll get girl germs
  
  Not if they get me germs first

- Luigi says [ Removed by Reddit ]
  
  Luigi says: Just imagine one of the others is a Healthcare insurance CEO, you know what to do.

Kill one person?
- If your stroke is good enough you don’t have to share the two apples with anyone.
  
  There are multiple kinds of strokes which will ensure you don't have to share (including a medical one that removes you)

Non-murder solution:
Place and hold the apples precisely on top of one another. (Make sure your fingers are not in the way.) From one side of the apple tower, go horizontally exactly two thirds of the way to the other side. At that position, cut vertically through both apples from top to bottom. You now have two pieces that are two thirds of an apple each, and two pieces that are one third each. The kid you like best will receive the end slices without the apple core in it.
More realistically, disregard the stupid premise and make as many cuts as you need.
- Apple’s aren’t square so it’s not so easy to figure out where to cut that will give you a 1/3 - 2/3 split.
- The knife looks long enough you could probably cut 1/3 of each apple while they are placed side by side, which might be easier and safer to cut than stacking the apples.
  
  That seems more possible than turning the knife 90 degrees mid-cut
  
  Bingo
  
  Yall just cut straight down with your knives? You dont angle the blade and slide it ?
- Take both apples and attach them to a drill. Position the knife on apples so that it starts slicing a long slice as they rotate and run the drill. You'll end up with a long piece of 2 apples and 2 cores. Keep the long peels, give each core to each one of those peasants.
- If the knife is long enough, you could simply line the apples up and do that.

What I find particoularly annoying and interesting, is that most of those "silly/dumb" social network questions are engineered with at least 2, sometimes more layers, for the purpose of getting a reaction not really from the "dumb people" but also, possibly mostly, from the smartass that can't help point out something they think they noticed, incongruity and the likes, unaware that those are there on purpose to bait them in.
This case is a lot more blatant, possibly fake, but the "controversial" interpretation of stabbing one of the children is not an afterthoughts of the sick mind of us memers terminally online, it's probably the core reason the thing has been shared and worded that way.
I just hope my own reaction has not been 100% predicted.
- Oh god, you reminded me of those "memes" that are just someone on Twitter getting simple math wrong. Reddit was full of that crap and it seems it hasn't quite reached Lemmy yet, but it might.
- With no snark intended I'm pretty sure thatsthejoke.jpg.
  
  no. the meme was created to make you think of stabbing people, with engagement bait paired in. op adds the awkward puppet meme, as if it's a novel idea, but thatsthejoke.xls
  the above commenter is pointing out how this kind of engagement just falls for the engagement bait, and describes the type of person who would do so

Bold of you to assume I'm not going to go Voorhees on both of them, have an apple as desert and save the second apple for later.
Obviously, I'm not going to eat the other two people. Without cooking them. And with the apple cores, I can make a lovely sauce to go with

That's socialist propaganda! You see, you cut both apples in half with one cut, everyone gets half an apple and the remaining half is given to someone who struggles affording life.
(/s)

I guess the answer they are going for is slice the apples straight through, horizontally, 1/3 the way up from the bottom, so you have 2/3, 1/3, 2/3, and 1/3 apple portions. Then you give 1 person the 2 1/3 portions, and the other 2 get one of the 2/3 portions each.
But we all know the actual answer people are thinking of
- You can cut them just like they are on the table - lop off the outer 1/3 of both the two as they sit. Two people each get 2/3 of an apple including the core, and one person gets two 1/3 apple slices.
  But yes, it wants you to suggest killing one of the kids for sure. :)
  
  But that wouldn't be one stroke would it? Unless I'm imagining it wrong.

I'd rather eat an orange. Apple skin gets stuck in my teeth.

This is impossible as the apples aren't homogeneous. Otherwise: have one person slide each apple across the knife until they feel their side is fair. The slice and pick. This does not work here as there are more than two people.
- Ah, but it does work for three if you allow up to five cuts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selfridge%E2%80%93Conway_procedure
  
  We explicitly don't.
- I mean, while we're being pedantic, you can never cut exactly 2/3 an apple for everyone, down to the atoms. Even with homogeneous apples.

Is 6% a cited estimate of the number of psychopaths in a population?
- Only 6% solved the puzzle in the very obvious correct way.
  Its the other 94% of people that are subconsciously fully distracted by the opportunity to do violence to see the clear solution that you should be worried about.
  
  Yeah that's what I was gonna say. I think 90% of people could solve this just fine but only 6% are solving it without thinking of stabbing a person to solve a non issue of non-existent scarcity.
  I'm leaving room for 10% to starve to death or cut themselves with the knife by accident.

slice the center child across the neck to prevent them from eating any, making there be one whole apple for each of the remaining children.