2D Chip Breakthrough: 6,000 Transistors, 3 Atoms Thick
2D Chip Breakthrough: 6,000 Transistors, 3 Atoms Thick
spectrum.ieee.org
2D Chip Breakthrough: 6,000 Transistors, 3 Atoms Thick
7 comments
-
..and they just replaced Silicon with Bizmuth in another study (>500ghz, smaller, more efficient). The West have already lost the ideological competitive race they still fantasize about..
-
Pretty much the only way a new computing substrate will be developed is through massive government funding. No company will spend billions of dollars and years of research on something that may or may not pan out in the end. It's just too much risk coupled with lack of short term profit. Meanwhile, the US has convinced Chinese government that they need to start doing precisely this kind of long term investment into computing tech, and now we're seeing a huge amount of innovation coming out of China in this domain.
-
Agreed. Intel spent too much time swimming in their wads of cash and are paying the price now.
-
And there is no way that anyone could have predicted that.
Right?
-
Capitalism's goal is not innovation is is about control and perpetually increasing revenue through that control.
-
-
Intel was technologically cooked when the first AMD Athlon came out, architecturally, and business-wise. They should have kicked true r&d into high-gear and didn't, really. The Core processors were something, but more of a nudge than something to stay relevant in the 21st century. If Apple can finally crack modems, Qualcomm will be next, although their mil/gov stuff may keep them in business as purely a contractor. Cisco is pretty close too, but they're too skilled at acquisitions as a method to keep staying relevant.
-
-
-
I’m seeing more like 7ghz for the bismuth stuff, still really good but nothing completely insane like 500 ghz. Do you have a source for that?
-
7 comments