Skip Navigation

Timeline: Israel’s attacks on hospitals throughout its war on Gaza

www.aljazeera.com

Timeline: Israel’s attacks on hospitals throughout its war on Gaza

Author: Al Jazeera
\ Published on: 13/04/2025 | 00:00:00

AI Summary:
\ Israel seized a corridor south of the war-battered Palestinian territory. Israeli army and Shin Bet agency claimed, without providing evidence, to have targeted a Hamas “command and control complex” in the hospital. Gaza’s healthcare facilities have been targeted repeatedly, including with 2,000-pound bombs made in the United States. Targeting of health facilities and medical personnel is considered a war crime. Israeli military said it killed 90 people in its raid on al-Shifa Hospital during a siege. Hamas condemned the “bloody massacre” in the hospital and said civilians, patients and displaced people were among those killed. March 31, 2024 Many people were killed and injured in an air raid on the yard of Al-Aqsa Hospital. October 14, 2024 An Israeli air attack on the largest hospital in the enclave saw hundreds of people killed, including medical staff.

Original: 603 words
\ Summary: 136 words
\ Percent reduction: 77.45%

I'm a bot and I'm open source

1 comments
  • Al Jazeera, the Qatari-owned media network, has been the subject of significant controversy regarding its alleged support for Islamist extremist groups and its relationship with the Qatari government. Here are some key points:

    1. Support for Extremist Groups:
      • Al Jazeera has been accused of providing a platform for extremist ideologies and supporting groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and even Al-Qaeda affiliates. The network has aired interviews with leaders of extremist groups and has been criticized for biased coverage that favors these entities.
      • The U.S. Department of Justice has noted that Al Jazeera is owned by the Qatari regime and has been used to project Qatar's vision, which includes support for extremist groups. This has led to calls for Al Jazeera to register as a foreign agent in the U.S. to ensure transparency.
    2. Financial Support and Influence:
      • Qatar has been accused of providing financial and material support to extremist and terrorist groups. This support is often channeled through Al Jazeera, which serves as a tool of political influence for the Qatari government. The network's content frequently aligns with Qatar's policies and interests, particularly in relation to Hamas and other extremist Sunni groups.
      • In 2017, several Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, issued demands to Qatar to close Al Jazeera, among other conditions, to restore diplomatic relations. These demands were part of a broader effort to curb Qatar's support for extremist groups and its meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.
    3. Criticism and Backlash:
      • Al Jazeera has faced criticism from various governments and media outlets for its alleged bias and support for extremist ideologies. For example, Egypt has accused Al Jazeera of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and has taken actions against the network, including revoking its broadcasting license and shutting down its Cairo bureau.
      • The network has also been criticized for its coverage of conflicts in the Middle East, with some accusing it of glorifying extremist groups and depicting certain populations in a negative light. This has led to a decline in its credibility among some of its former supporters.
    4. Role in Regional Politics:
      • Al Jazeera's role in regional politics is closely tied to Qatar's foreign policy. The network has been used to promote Qatar's agenda and to undermine its rivals. This has contributed to tensions in the region and has led to calls for greater scrutiny of Al Jazeera's activities.

    In summary, Al Jazeera's links to Islamist extremist support and its relationship with Qatar are well-documented. The network has been accused of providing a platform for extremist ideologies, receiving financial support from the Qatari government, and facing significant criticism and backlash from various governments and media outlets.