Skip Navigation
47 comments
  • This is a question that's great at getting theological arguments going. So to start with, we're going to be ignoring religions and cultures not dominated by abrahamic religions because Hinduism split from mesopotamian religions in a very different way than Judaism and religions not associated with or influenced by the the mesopotamian civilization start are wildly different and I don't know shit about them.

    So, archeologically, evidence points to the Abrahamic God forming out of two or so male gods from mesopotamia and what began as a group devoting to that god eventually developed into a monotheistic religion. It looks like this may have been a storm god in competition with Baal, but as his religion developed he became androgynous but maintained he/him pronouns.

    Theologically: hoo fucking boy that's a fight right there. Neopagans and Mormons are in agreement that it's because he's a manifestation of the divine masculine and that there exists a divine feminine counterpart. Catholics (and to my knowledge jews though I've met some who agree with the neopagans and mormons) say that it's tradition to address him in the masculine but he's genderless. Some protestants will argue that he's male and that men were created in his image and women less so. Other protestants agree with the Catholics. Others will say that the holy spirit is the divine feminine. And I'm sure many other interpretations exist.

  • If my understanding is correct

    With Islam, the deity is meant to have no gender and the use of "he" has more to do with the nuances of Arabic language

    With Christianity, there is more anthropomorphism and the deity is seen as a father figure in comparison to everything else

  • Why? I'm not sure I'm up to a proper history of the Abrahamic religions and how their deity came to be who and what it is. Like, entire books have covered it, written by people with a shit ton more ability to research and support their conclusions than I can.

    I'm not even sure how to tackle the subject in a comment length synopsis. Suffice it to say that there is a long and complicated history that led to that branch of religion. It wasn't a single deity growing out of nothing, unconnected to other gods and myths.

    So, I'll limit myself to the second part of the question.

    I think that if you boil it down, Isis is probably what you're looking for. I can't think of any other goddesses with such a popular following across the world, across multiple eras. She was a fairly big deity in various Egyptian eras and surrounding locations, and had a major following throughout Greece and Rome over millennia.

    You could argue that Inanna was equally a top goddess, though I've seen it argued that they're the same goddess with different names as "she" spread across the ancient world cultures.

    But I'm comfortable saying that Isis was, in some times and areas, way more important than Yahweh/Jehovah/Allah/El/Adonai, or whatever other names you want to apply to that deity, in some of the places and times "he" has been worshipped.

    If you look only at the current world, I think you'd be hard pressed to find any goddess having that kind of almost monotheistic fervor though. Even Wiccans and other neopagans don't glom onto a single goddess, and they usually equally revere gods on average.

    Since none of the polytheistic religions around the world throughout history really had one god above all gods on a reliable basis, you have to look at sects and cults for equivalents to the monotheistic cults and religions. And that means Isis. She was popular enough to have what amounted to a monotheistic following, here and there.

    I wouldn't argue or fuss if anyone had another candidate, or disagreed with my take though. I sure as hell stopped maintaining my body of knowledge about religions almost twenty years ago, so I can't pull things out of memory on the subject the way I can with stuff I keep myself refreshed on. And with something that covers as much territory as religion, you gotta keep things fresh or they get buried under mountains of memory.

  • the cultures that were around when abrahamic religions (christianity, judaism, islam, and all offshoots whether considered separate or not) were the patriarchal (men in charge) and misogynystic (prejudice against women). this was adopted into their religion, which in turn influenced the future of their culture and any cultures it took hold in. large islamic and christian states such as the ottoman empire, the (later) roman empire, and the catholic empire i mean church spread this to pretty much all of europe and the middle east. colonialism spread this influence to the americas and part of africa. this large influence, along with trade, also affected religions in places that were not affected as much, such as asia and the parts of africa they didn't colonise. this resulted in pretty much all of the non-asian world having a abrahamic religion as their biggest one, which caused the various african, pre-catholic european, and pre-colonial american religions to be either eradicated or forgotten. it also prevented the prominent asian religions (which were already well-established at that point, and did the same thing as the previous point to the areas they were in) from spreading much further.

    as it's relevant to the topic, I feel like I should mention that I am a christian. I don't think anything I said here was biased, but if i missed something important please let me know so i don't accidentally misrepresent other religions.

47 comments