2w ago

Seems like solid advice

You're viewing a single thread.

65 comments

Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers.
- Women in Afghanistan are not allowed to speak or be seen through windows.
  Is there are a country where men are treated the same?
  Edit: Wow. Imagine if y’all get as upset about rape and femicide as you did about sometimes women being a little snotty to men online.
  
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
  Response to your edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
  
  Doesn't apply. They provided a direct example that disproves your claim.
  
  Person A: Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers.
  Person B: WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN AFGHANISTAN?!
  So, what about women's treatment in Afghanistan disproves the claim "Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers"?
  Do vague, sexist generalizations not deserve rude answers because of the treatment of women in Afghanistan?
  Maybe if women were treated better in Afghanistan then vague sexist answers would be more deserving of rude answers?... Or would they be less deserving?
  Are you a bot? Because nothing that you typed makes any sense, at all, in this context.
- Damn, Poe's Law hittin this comment hard, and I can't tell from the instance either.
  Edit: oh Jesus, they were serious. Parody truly is dead. At least we get to publicly shame the stupid misandrist.
  
  Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.
  
  It seems that you nailed it.
  
  sadly I have to take a comment about how males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously
  
  O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.
  sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.
  It's not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it's the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.
  
  if males get disadvantaged, they're getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
  
  By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
  The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
  
  So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
  
  that's realistically more achievable than the other way around
  
  Women are privileged by the patriarchy in some ways too, so I guess misogyny’s back on the menu, right? /s
  Dumb misandrist.
  
  Are there places so privileged where women have harems of male sex slaves? Is there a country with organized matriarchy?
  
  Congratulations, you missed the point.
  
  calling out that males have privileges, which women and people of the LGBTQQIAAP+ community do not have, is misandry
  
  No, but saying they deserve hostilities as a result is.
  
  Yeah how DARE people make memes! That's definitely the same as taking away someone's bodily autonomy!
  
  I can't tell whose views you're trying to parody because that doesn't align with either half of the discussion.
  
  they're still getting less hostilities than most other groups
  
  Okay.
  Do you think that's relevant to determining whether or not you're being misandrist?
  Or are you just defending your misandry by saying people who are attacked less deserve to be attacked?
  
  I'm not misandrist. I just want everyone to have the closest level of privilegation possible
  
  You're a crab in a bucket, pulling at other crabs to ensure they're treated poorly because someone else is rather than encouraging others to treat each other well.
  By pretending, or worse, believing that the best way to a better society is by making things worse for certain groups, you have more in common with misogynists than anyone else.
  Your attitude is used as ammunition by the far right to convince impressionable people that feminists are inherently hostile and unreasonable, and if women are elevated in society, they will immediately use any gained power to attack men.
  
  You are literally championing anti-male sentiment. You are being sexist here.
  
  anti-male sentiment
  I'm male myself, so I'm allowed to say this (it's like the n-word)
  additionally, since females don't actually exist, I have to be anti-male.
  
  Again the solution to reducing sexism is not more sexism. We don’t resolve bigotry by being bigots.
  You aren’t defending anyone’s honor. You are just taking an extremely offensive and narcissistic perspective while trying to justify your hateful perspective.
  You aren’t improving things by doing what you are doing
  
  "My political beliefs allow me to be a jerk to people".

65 comments