Trans polyamory is praxis
Trans polyamory is praxis
31 comments
-
Equating communism with the common ownership of women. First as tragedy, then as kink.
-
It's "held in common", not "being publicly owned". Bit of a difference in the connotations there, especially given that polyamory tends to openly reject how monogamous relationships tend to intertwine intimate and property relationships, or how lesbianism rejects the hierarchies built into heteronormativity, or how kink replaces implicitly coercive power dynamics with affirmative consent and voluntary boundaries.
-
Held in common just means cuddling is very common 🤔
-
-
-
he was so ahead of his time with this shit. pity it wasn't really upheld as an important aspect of Marxism by a lot of our faves (hey we're doing the socialist family, oops it's the nuclear family again), and we sadly still have a long way to go. Cuba at least is one place making strides in this area with their new family laws.
-
People aren’t held in common, property is.
Really dislike the framing of this even as a joke shitpost
-
Fixed it
-
-
Communism is soviet power plus the transfeminization of the whole country.
-
You heard it here on Hexbear folks, monogamy is classist
-
Monogamy will always have a place for the very simple reason that:
- Polygamous relationships means more in-laws, both from having more than one partner and each partner having a possibility of having more than two parents.
- Nobody wants to deal with in-laws.
Imagine having to juggle around 9 in-laws (3 partners with 3 parents each). Fucking nightmare fuel.
-
only if you kitchen table it, there's lots of ways that polyam relationships can be arranged. plus in laws are only a problem if they're a problem, some people's parents are chill.
-
Making a dating app that matches you with orphans to overcome this issue
-
In that society the parents would also have polyamorous relationships, so imagine having 8 in-laws from one side. And they are all crusty.
-
The difference between in-laws and outlaws:
Outlaws are wanted
-
This but 100% unironically.
-
Vultures? Bourgeois. Bald Eagles? Reactionaries. Skinks? Fascists
-
Arrogant Guinea Fowl? Owls with Shifty looks?
-
-
Kind of? Humans are not as monogamous as other actually monogamous species.
-
-
-
I wonder how that conversation went
(as the eldest son): hey dad you can't get with any more ladies anymore okay? why? looks at dad's wealth* because.. uhh.. you just can't okay!?
-
Harden your heart, o Qin Huangdi!
Increase your attacks so cruel!
Send them all to live with me
In an enby sapphic polycule!(refrain)
|: Qin Huangdi, do your worst
To the cis boys to make them thirst :|
For the selfsame HRT
Their bourgeois state withholds from me!(refrain)
|: And I sing to Qin Huangdi:
What, pray tell, do you want from me? :|
And I assure you this is not a bit,
Nor am I a feckless hypocrite.(refrain)
[still continues]
-
-
But the REAL question is, is our programme to be written in rust or C++?
-
It's gotta be Rust, my man.
-
R5RS Scheme
-
-
Mandatory pet kink huh?
-
And then we must coerce those women into becoming scientists.
-
Always love being ahead of the curve
-
And here I thought monogamy was invented by detective fiction writers so they could easily make up tons of murders
31 comments