Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
14 0 Reply🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
6 0 ReplyThe function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
4 1 ReplyNyar!
1 0 ReplyThis is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
60 0 ReplyThose are backups in case the other functions break down.
4 0 Replygolang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
26 0 Reply
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
49 0 ReplyAmericans will use anything other than metric
4 0 ReplyBut what if it was grown in Europe?
24 0 ReplyNaranja
12 0 ReplySo to clarify, definitely European and not African?
4 0 Reply
"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger's TeX
34 0 ReplyIts probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
33 0 ReplyI mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
21 0 ReplyI can answer the question. No.
19 0 ReplyHe’s right.
6 0 Reply
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
15 0 ReplyChrist, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
4 0 ReplyI get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
2 0 Reply
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
7 0 ReplyThanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
4 0 ReplyThanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅
1 0 ReplyOh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
1 0 Reply