Because my initial comment was about metacritic and my argument is that metacritic is a bad indicator of review bombing because it actually encourages it
You didn't actually mention metacritic in the comment I replied to.. you said people claim a review bomb and I said well yeah, it is. I really dont care about metacritic either but its kinda annoying when people bend definitions because a word has gotten a certain connotation.
So my question repeats: why mention it as if I'm defending it when I merely correctly stated its a review bomb. Like why are you trying to make that a discussion when it's not..
I'm not even making it a discussion. You mentioned metacritic in your (now edited) comment and I explained why metacritic's system actively encourages review bombing. So it's no wonder you'll see a decent amount of review bombing there.