Skip Navigation

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
32 comments
  • I mean …sort of all of it (“Do you post the history of every news organization that lists pro-democrat articles as well?”) and the quantity as well. It’s pretty obvious you have no chill and freak out constantly in the comments. Must be exhausting.

    • So let me get this straight. A guy decided to post a history of the news org wrote the news article that I posted.

      I told him I thought was a strange response. He replied that he felt it was a biased news source and wanted to let everyone know.

      And I asked him if he did that for other articles as well. And you think me asking that is "weirdly defensive"?

      It’s pretty obvious you have no chill and freak out constantly in the comments

      Please show me one "freak out" that I have had? I reply to comments with the same tone that is offered to me. And many times, in a much nicer tone than is offered to me.

      Several comments that people have said to me have been removed, while mine have not. Doesn't sound like the freak out is on my side.

      I'm not freak out at all or even upset by commenters on Lemmy. This is zero affect on my real life.

      You seem to know an awful lot about my comments and my so-called "freak outs." Maybe you are reading a bit much into it, friend.

      Maybe you mistake my wordiness for freaking out. I type fast because I'm a writer. None of this takes up much of my time, nor troubles me.

      Let me guess tho: I've been very wordy in my response to you. So this is yet another example of my "weird defensiveness" and "freaking out." Yes?

      • Bwhahahahaha! Well done! Wow, you really went for it.

        Or if you were being serious - what a weirdly defensive reply. But that’s par for the course isn’t?

        • Well I do understand that it may take you a while to read all those words.

          But hey, I was right that you would think it was a weirdly defensive reply, so we can be friends now, right?

          Oh wait...crap! You probably think that this was a weirdly defensive reply too. Dammit! Oh man, we may not be able to break the cycle!

          • Well I do understand that it may take you a while to read all those words

            Wow, so uncivil! Now edging from “weirdly defensive” to just “weird”. Which - considering your post history lately - is on brand I suppose.

            • I was only assuming since you saw what I was saying as weirdly defensive and I couldn't see any other reason you would think that. So I was incorrect? It wasn't the amount of words that made me seem weirdly defensive then?

              Which - considering your post history lately - is on brand I suppose.

              You seem awfully interested in my post history. I feel so important now. Thank you!

              • Interested? No. Just unwillingly subjected to your constant freakouts and weird defensiveness. Your shallow need to attack anything that gets posted in any thread you’re on. Your walls of text attempting to bludgeon others into acceptance, or at least submission. Your straw man arguments and other constant logical fallacies.

                Probably the worst case of main character syndrome I’ve ever seen. No one needs to go looking for your post history - it exists as a sickly miasma on everyone’s /all feed. And the funniest part is that you obviously think you’re so clever, and yet everything you do just makes people want to pay attention to anything you say less and less.

                In short - weird.

                • Probably the worst case of main character syndrome I’ve ever seen. No one needs to go looking for your post history - it exists as a sickly miasma on everyone’s /all feed. And the funniest part is that you obviously think you’re so clever, and yet everything you do just makes people want to pay attention to anything you say less and less.

                  Sounds like you should really just block me then, since I get under your skin that much. Then you wouldn't have to see my posts or my comments or put up with my "freakouts" and "weird defensiveness."

                  So why haven't you?

                  • Because you don’t matter enough to bother blocking and I find your schtick to be somewhat amusing in how transparent it is.

                    • Because you don’t matter enough to bother blocking and I find your schtick to be somewhat amusing in how transparent it is.

                      Ohhhh, ok ok ok so I'm important enough to argue with and told how I suffer from freakouts and weird defensiveness, but it doesn't bother you enough to actually block me.

                      Hmmm, sounds like the issue may be on your end then. So ya have no reason to be upset since you find me "somewhat amusing"! See? Yay!

                      Because if you don't wanna spend 3 seconds to block me, then I guess you're fine seeing what I have to say.

                      Oh man, you are really feeding into the whole "main character syndrome" thing that ya just accused me of having. I mean, I guess I am a main character since after all that you have said about me STILL doesn't make you want to block me.

                      This is awesome. Thank you for the ego boost!

                      • What gave you any idea I was upset? You’d have to matter for me to be upset and we’ve already addressed that issue. You just asked why I said you were weirdly defensive and here you are showing time and again why that’s such an apt description. You really can’t help yourself, can you? It would add to the amusement if it didn’t have such an undercurrent of need to it. You’re trying so hard and all it does is make you seem desperate and weird.

                        At this point, any additional reply you make will just be more obvious trolling so I won’t bother to reply. You see, now you’re just becoming boring.

You've viewed 32 comments.