we live in a country where robbing a convenience store prevents you from voting, but gerrymandering doesn't.
It's funny how power is more important than reality. Let's wait a few decades and see if power can overcome environmental collapse caused by its efforts for more power.
God I hope not. To me, worst case scenario is some tiny human population descended from the owner class that destroyed the world being maintained by finally of age AI servants keeping the unsurvivable elements at bay for them.
I also think this is their desired outcome.
I'd prefer extinction to selecting for the most successfully sociopathic.
Taking away the rights of felons to vote makes their incarceration unjust by its nature, and just makes them people trapped in cages by people with guns, might equals right. They'd still have to have a say in the laws that imprison them to be justly imprisoned. Also, if we cared about rehabilitation, spoilers: our culture is actually hostile to the concept, we'd be encouraging civic participation, not banning it.
But Americans have always had a raging, hateful
justicevengeance boner to feel better about our own inadequacies in a nation built by slaves atop our genocide victims.A civilized nation would want their citizens who made a mistake, often because society failed them, to be rehabilitated and thrive as their fellow citizens.
We don't do that here. Our ex-cons are set up for failure after already going in desperate. Then every conservative and a majority of neoliberals cheers when they do, like it's a victory for them.
You can talk about all the world's despots and dictators, but we still have the largest population of incarcerated citizens on Earth, and not even per capita. More of our people live in bondage than even China with its billion people. We found the...🤮...private profit in putting human beings in cages for any excuse.
For a country that began with "no taxation without representation" it's a huge hypocrisy to take away a person's voting rights yet expect him to continue contributing.
Not exactly, just because they can’t vote now doesn’t mean they never could but yeah it kinda reinforces the status quo by eliminating competition.
I wholeheartedly agree with rehabilitation though
But I get a bit more extreme than most people like I see absolutely no benefit in locking people up, like at all. The only goal of incarceration should be rehabilitation anything less is a waste of resources and if there is no hope of rehabilitation well let’s just say that’s where me and the masses opinion differ.
It's MORE important for a prisoner to have a say in the laws keeping them imprisoned for those laws to be just.
Let's say a new fascist regime says everyone with green eyes goes to jail. That's a lot of people who think that law is unjust who are now just voiceless slaves, it's self-perpetuating. Now use this for civil rights, LGBT, on and on. Revoking a citizen's vote in addition to their freedom demonstrates how a perceived right gets devalued to an easily revokable privilege.
Its essential for any society that claims to value democracy, like the democratic republic we play pretend we are, to maximize enfranchisement, especially to those that fall subject to punishment of our laws.
But let's be honest. We don't even get a vote on the economy, just 2 bribed parties that differ on the social issue symptom management of said economy. We were never what we claimed and believed ourselves to be at any point. We're a gold plated, antisocial garbage oligarchy.
You didn't see any benefit in locking up people like Donald Trump and Jeffrey Dahmer?
I'll be the first the point out that many—perhaps most—felons aren't dangerous, but some of them clearly are.
We've regressed to Facebook rage comics
alwayshasbeen.jpg
What do you think the whole Wojak thing are.
Except this one is funny
Everyone, including criminals, should be able to vote or run for presidency. In the end, what’s a crime and what’s not is decided by the law, which is made by the politicians. What’s to stop a president from making something illegal for the sole purpose of making their opponents criminals so they are guaranteed a win next election?
If a president can do that, there's something wrong with the way your government is set up. I disagree, it affects personality cults the most and if it's about the issues that you care about, there should be no shortage of candidates. This is someone you are electing to lead your country for four years. I would concede that it does depend on the severity of the crime.
Oh, there is quite a bit wrong with the way our government is set up. We each break multiple laws per day and it's entirely a matter of which ones they want to prosecute. They've already targeted indigenous and black people with overly broad laws, and I wouldn't put it past them to go after Muslims next.
There is no direct line out of this mess; we'll have to fix multiple things in parallel.
If your vote can be taken away, people in power have an incentive to criminalize their political rivals.
Noice
So weird that that taking away voting rights permanently is a thing in the US. I might.. maybe.. understand suspending it while someone is under scentence or on probation. But even then, they are your citizens.
Weird yes. But completely logical when you wrongfully arrest black people for crimes they didn't commit.
I feel the same way.
In Germany voting rights can be restricted only in very serious cases like high treason (like inciting a mob to storm and overthrow a lawfully elected government). And it doesnt happen automatically or permanently. It needs a separate judgment for up to 5 years.
In the US you just have to find a way to criminalise your opposition and throw them all into prison. Other autocratic countries already do this en mass.
Yeah.. they have plenty of laws on the books that are straight out of the totalitarian playbook. And most Americans think that's fine.. if someone trips and falls.. fuck em right?
Louisiana will even permanently remove parts of your body if they think you raped a child without marrying them first.
"An offender could refuse to get the surgery, but would then be sentenced to three to five years of an additional prison sentence without the possibility of getting out early."
It's elective in the rare heinous cases it would be applied in.
Honest question: Is Trump actually allowed to vote in the upcoming election?
I'm absolutely against restricting voting rights. But in this case I'd see it as some kind of higher justice done.
For convictions in other states, Florida law defers to the laws in those states. New York will only prevent him from voting while he's actually in prison.
LMAO.
