Skip Navigation

28th of September was the only day with more monthly active Lemmy users than the previous one, probably thanks to the release of Boost for Lemmy

Link to the daily stats: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

By the way, welcome to everyone who joined thanks to Boost!

Fediverse @lemmy.ml

It seems that we lost 200 Lemmy servers yesterday

71 14
SNOOcalypse - document, discuss, and promote the downfall of Reddit. @lemmy.ml

Lemmy daily stats 🚀

7 0
Data Is Beautiful @lemmy.ml

Fediverse Observer - Lemmy

5 0
98 comments
  • I've been following the stats closely. There were actually several times that the active users ticked down and then ticked up the next day, the most recent being September 19/20. But I suspect that may be a statistical artifact, whereas the increase on September 28 is legit. It looks like about 1000 new accounts were created/became active on that day.

    User attrition has slowed significantly in September compared to August. We should stabilize somewhere in 30,000 range for MAUs before the end of the year, which is not too shabby. We are unlikely to see another big wave of growth until the code is significantly more mature, but the current userbase is fairly well established and self sufficient.

    I can't wait until we get that next wave so we can have more sports fans and humanities types, but you guys are alright for now 😅

    • As I said a bit lower in this thread, on Lemmy World we recently switched the default view from 'local' to 'all' for the new sign-ups. But it might be a good thing to do this once, for all existing users. Ofcourse with a proper announcement and an explanation on how to change this to 'local' or even 'subscribed'. It might give communities on other instances a bit more exposure as well.

      • Sounds great. I mean, given the size of lemmy.world it sure doesn't hurt it and it will certainly distribute more user attention to smaller communities, which will hopefully activate smaller communities from remote instance, which will in turn make the overall conversation quality on lemmy better.

        Excited to see whether it will be a noticable effect but I would think so

    • It looks like about 1000 new accounts were created/became active on that day.

      I remember @antik@lemmy.world mentioning similar numbers, so that's probably this.

      We should stabilize somewhere in 30,000 range for MAUs before the end of the year

      That's what I foresee as well.

      so we can have more sports fans and humanities types

      Discoverability of those communities is probably the first issue to fix. I tried to address it a while back, maybe I should do another one of those posts: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/2410183

    • 30,000 range for MAUs before the end of the year, ... current userbase is fairly well established and self sufficient.

      I see it differently. It looks like the majority of communities struggle with not enough content/discussions, many de-facto are blogs of mods/creators where others are passive subscribers.

      • It looks like the majority of communities struggle with not enough content/discussions

        This is true, but also subjective. How do you define enough? Enough to doomscroll or enough to check for 10 minutes daily? All we really need to be self sufficient is enough content to keep people coming back regularly, we don't need to replicate reddit.

        many de-facto are blogs of mods/creators where others are passive subscribers.

        This seems like an exaggeration. Most communities that have quality content also have quality discussion, in my experience.

    • Did you notice that the Average Lemmy Comments by Day looks really weird? Some of the sudden jumps could be attributed to real life events, but I’m more inclined to think there’s something buggy going on with the way three numbers are logged. Besides, there’s also a sudden dip!

  • Nice, Boost was definitely mentioned in a lot of the applications I approved.

    • Hey, good to see you here!

      I was wondering, would it be possible to have !sexmemes@lemmyf.uk as NSFW for the whole community again?

      I get that a few posts might need to be tagged as such from time to time, but most of the content there is mostly SFW, and quite funny.

      • You too!

        It is tagged NSFW now. I messed around with in not being a few times but have left it tagged for a while now. It definitely gets more activity when not tagged. Which way were you meaning in your post? You confused me with the last part.

98 comments