"it's basic science!!!" | the basic science in question:
"it's basic science!!!" | the basic science in question:
local twitter user forgets how the sun works 
You're viewing a single thread.
Sex in mammals, defined by the function of producing sperm and ova, is indeed binary. No serious biologist will disagree with that. I don't really understand the problem with that.
defined by the function of producing sperm and ova
new sex just dropped https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility/index.htm
Infertility is not normal
If there are 10 people in a room, and 9 of them have brown hair and 1 of them has red hair, you cannot assert "There are no people with red hair in this room.".
The "Exceptions don't count!" argument amounts to nothing but grasping at straws to deliberately make your parameters for defining these words exclusionary.
You have no reason to deny the validity of these "exceptions" that disprove your absolutist definitions, so why do you?
I can't tell if this is a bit or not lol
Why would it be bait?
Because trans rights are human rights
Lmao there's several animals capable of changing their gender. There's plenty of animals with a sexual dimorphism that goes beyond just "male and female" showing a wider range of what we can understand the concept of "gender" to be. If we go on to include bugs and molluscs shit gets really wild. Don't get me started on fungi
Did you miss the part where I specifically mentioned sex and mammals?
No, I just refused to engage with the narrow confines you've arbitrarily set.
