You're viewing part of a thread.
Show Context
83
comments
So your issue is people consensually exchanging their labor?
Permanently Deleted
That's no strawman. You just refuse to see that there is no universal way to decide upon value that fits everyone's notion of it. If both people in an exchange come away satisfied, did one exploit the other? How do you strictly define the excess value on each side of the transaction? Your idea of a profit-less society doesn't consider how we'd pragmatically exchange our labor to achieve that.
Permanently Deleted
We aren't mind readers. If you think we are wrong, explain why. You can call an attempt at defining your poor communication a strawman, but it only shields your ideas from the test of debate.
Permanently Deleted
You've viewed 83 comments.