this impugning of wikipedia is intellectually dishonest and lazy, to boot. reading the entry this user posted will give you an understanding of the conspiracy theory that he is pigeonholing with the accusation of genocide. one of them has merit, and the fact that both of them have explanatory articles in an encyclopedia does not undermine the content of either of those articles. i encourage everyone to read the reptillian article first, to establish an understanding of the editorial standards at wikipedia. doing so will give you a good grasp of how to approach the article linked by index@shitjustworks
this impugning of wikipedia is intellectually dishonest and lazy, to boot.
Wikipedia is public, updated and cross checked with multiple sources. Something dishonest and lazy are these fools that don't even bother reading a wikipedia page when it is linked.