Skip Navigation

Fair warning to anyone considering Starfield. The performance of this game is absolute crap.

It runs at 30fps on all the lowest settings on a 2070 with 64gb ram and an i9-12900K.

It is quite possibly the worst performing game I have ever seen. It's a piece of crap.

Glad I didn't pay for this shit. And I will not. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ The writing and worldbuilding is probably AI and gutter tier liberal political takes anyway.

I am absolutely stunned by just how badly this thing runs like omfg I run Elden Ring at 120fps at the same resolution. What the fuck is wrong at Bethesda? I'm so mad about this I just played Armoured Core at a rock solid 144fps and it is so jarring to go from that to this absolutely horrific performance.

158

You're viewing a single thread.

158 comments
  • There are times I'm unhappy to be right about something I was being pessimistic about, I'll admit this isn't really one of those times

    Bethesda and todd have had a massive ego problem for almost 2 decades now and they've been past their prime since before Oblivion, kinda hope they eat shit on this a bit

    This game lets you "do everything" but it has giant mechs that aren't able to be piloted while Armored Core 6 just lets you pilot the giant mech and does that well, I know which I prefer

    • There are no rovers, no bikes, no jeeps, and no shuttles. You can't choose where to land your ship or fly it on the planet at all. It lands somewhere, and you have to walk to your destination (Bouncy silly jetpacks don't count).

      Like come on Elite Dangerous has shitty little buggies and it's a decade old game made with beer money.

You've viewed 158 comments.