Jewish Leaders Call for Boycott After Elon Musk's Nazi Salute, Holocaust Jokes
Jewish leaders are pushing advertisers to drop Musk's hate speech incubator X-formerly-Twitter following his Nazi salutes and Holocaust jokes.
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/54702117
You're viewing a single thread.
It would mean more if Israel weren't actively genociding Palestinians.
Oh look, someone who thinks that "Jew" and "Israeli" are synonyms.
As always, no matter where I live, no matter how much I say I hate Israel, I will always be a foreigner and a Zionist.
Really? You really think that? I know that plenty of Jewish outside of Israel don't support the current genocide of Palestinians, and I know plenty do.
Good job interpreting @FlyingSquid@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world's comment the literal exact opposite way of what it meant.
I think you sure as fuck implied it, when you said:
It would mean more if Israel weren’t actively genociding Palestinians.
Why would it mean more unless Jew and Israeli were synonyms?
Are they likewise condemning the genocide?
Log the fuck out, go outside, and meet some people. A lot of us grew up raised by holocaust survivors and we have very strong opinions that Israel's genocide against the people of Palestine is truly and wholly horrible.
Ah, I see, so it isn't "Jew = Israeli," it's "Jew = Pro genocide." Totally different.
Do you also expect every Muslim to denounce ISIS every time they face bigotry themselves? I bet you don't.
Da'esh. They surely were, when da'esh was in the news.
You're evading. I didn't ask if they were. I asked if you expected it. Do you? Or are only Jews expected to denounce genocide every time they face bigotry in your view?
@flying squid, part of the problem: "85% of American Jewish adults believe it is important for the U.S. to support Israel"
To their detriment, people generally do not think about any population with statistical terms. Humans are tribalist and much prefer binary thinking and always have. Linguists say that is not going to change and will get worse. I hear that our embrace of stats in the later 1900s was an aberation in the arc of historical rhetoric.
So the question becomes, when does a random fellow human feel its right to make generalizations?
when its 50% +1 (aka "more right than wrong")
99%?
99.999%
or only at 100%?
Given, its a sliding scale dependent on the harm being done by making the assumption. If this decision kills someone, people generally will not make an assumption unless they are in an incited mob. If it will irritate or unfairly characterize you, nobody cares, and they will feel free to assume.
surety at 100% is obviously the ideal answer, but humans will never approach that because its too much work. We dont care about the uniqueness of individuals who self identify into a group. Most people tend much more toward 50%+1 than 100% in their thinking. As an example, I'm sure there were some (maybe not many) actually good people in the german nazi party. Maybe they werent aware of the murders, or their kid was a soldier, or whatever. Ever heard anyone talk about being careful not to malign them? And no, I am not suggesting we sympathize with nazis. This is part of the problem judges had to wrestle with after ww2: "not evil nazis"
Theres also the problem of crypto nazis as well. People who are secretly in favor of genocide but wont admit it outright. Humans lie, we all know this, so embracing someone on their word is not a successful strategy. We have to watch their actions instead. And we get tired of looking earnestly for outliers. Sorry, its not fair, but as far as I can tell its how humanity works, broadly speaking. Additionally, people do recognize that a lot of manipulation and marketing shenanigans has been going on around the Palestinian genocide. Yes, we are stupid, but we are just smart enough to see how ham-fisted that effort was. Thats not even going into what happened in the last election.
And theres the problem of aggregation. Sure any one member of a group stands a 15% chance of being against the genocide, but when 3 people get together, whats the odds that they are all against genocide? It drops from 15% per person to 3 tenths of one percent for a group of 3 all being members of that minority. This assumes uniform distribution of that viewpoint across a defined population.
You do know that Jews live in countries other than Israel and the U.S., right?
But your multi-paragraph attempt at justifying calling all Jews Zionists by default is noted.
your multi-paragraph attempt at justifying calling all Jews Zionist is noted
Thats not what I said at all. You're lashing out and putting words in my mouth. The TLDR is that your complaint is doomed by human nature. So you better get creative.
And hey, my "attempt" is "noted"?
Well your emotional outbursts and manipulative straw manning is "noted". Seems you arent acting maturely enough to consider these problems in the abstract. Thats a 'you' problem bud. Way to miss the point and insert your own "woe is me!" cry as the only consideration here. You are displaying the same binary thinking as I was talking about in my post.
As to your other comment: You do know that Jews live in countries other than Israel and the U.S., right?
Sure. but over 82% of the worlds jewish population live in the US and in Israel. Did you know that?
I'm not jewish, or Palestinian, or religious in any way, but I am flatly against war crimes and genocide, period. And that puts me in the progressive camp where I am shat upon by the population just as much as you feel now, if not more. But you have lumped me in with the people who define all jews as zionists. Do you see how you are jumping to conclusions about me in exactly the manner you are angry about other people doing to you?
No. I don't expect any decent behavior from anyone, but the United States administration should apologize for creating conditions that caused it, and fix it. And these circumstances are actively different, and I will try to be more sensitive. I don't expect you to self reflect, since several people have called your words/reactions out in various threads, but that's no reason I shouldn't.
What words and reactions are those that "several people" have called out? Go on. Call me a Zionist and prove my point.
I'm not searching for every post. I'll remind you of the post naming lemmy famous people. I think you want everyone to treat you with just gloves because you're fragile and volatile. If not for the other Jewish people I may have come of that way who_aren't_ that fragile and volatile, I wouldn't have given it a second thought. I don't dislike you either, I just know that's who you are.
