3个月前

Windows VS Linux (part 2)

您正在查看单个对话串。

262 评论

This was made by someone who has never used either
- Eh, Windows complaints tend to get pretty hyperbolic much of the time. It’s slow and annoying but I’ve always worked with it
  But the description of the Linux update process matches my experience with mint, pretty much. I even use the GUI update utility because it will put a little icon in the bottom corner of the screen. It’s quick even if I’m using a program that’s going an update, and if the kernel gets updated it’s just like “hey remember to reboot buddy!”
- Besides missing dependencies or repositories for more nice software this kinda closely matches my experience though.
  (Ignoring winget, becaust it is not really the mainstream way to install windows software)
  What is your specific issue with this?
  
  Mostly that this hasn't been my experience with Windows for like 20 years.
  They might as well bitch about dropping their punch cards.
  
  I still (have to) download scetchy executables on Windows when I want to install most programms, while on debian I can install most programs via apt and a few repositories. Even when it's not a standard repo I still prefer it over random executables because while the security is just as bad at least I get updates without having to open the program itself.
  But what resonated with me most have been the restarts for updates. Happened way to often that I wanted to stop working but cant just shut down windows without updates and the accompanying reboots. (If I don't check up in between to decrypt the disk on startups it'll just sit there and run out the battery and I have to do the restarts on the next workday). On debian I just klick the power button, it hibernates (or I shut it down if I'm in the mood) and os updates are completely seperate from that.
  
  What sketchy executables are you downloading?
  What makes downloading steam from valve more sketchy than allowing a Linux repo to run arbitrary code as root on your machine for every single one of thousands of pieces of software maintained by strangers?
  
  I remember going to source forge to download MPC-BE
  Later found out that they were adding adware to executables
  
  All software is maintained by strangers.
  Some software websites just look sketchy but aren't, which makes it harder for people to filter out the actual sketchy ones. That's just the reality. Jokes about download pages with 4 download buttons also didn't come falling out of the sky.
- Literally
  My desktop/laptop experience for both is as follows:
  Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser (unless you count w98 "everything is a website" concept for the desktop or the far in between instances were a PC was offline/having issues and you need to download update packages)
  It also updated windows applications (ie office) but yeah it never intended to upgrade other stuff, all other software had their own auto update check
  I'll concede the restart because yeah it does all for that
  But yeah Linux install is not without issues, and I'll just remind everyone of how difficult it was/is to install a component driver when it's not automatically found (wifi cards, disk controllers, and Realtek drivers anyone?)
  Yeah it does update your apps, as long as you have the repos, and restart wise I distinctively remember that you do need to do restarts after updates, be it major distro or not.
  Simple commands? I'll concede that, as long as we remember the average Linux user is used to a less user friendly experience. Complain ask you want but for the average user, windows update experience works
  Thankfully I don't need to deal with all that stuff now
  
  Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser
  In xp it still was an website which required IE due to activex used to do the updates.
  
  I haven't had a driver issue except for Nvidia where the driver exists, but it sucks
  
  NVIDIA is the second biggest wankstain of a thing on my computer, unfortunately AMD didn't put high end GPUs in laptops so there wasn't a whole lot of choice.
  
  What's so hard about sudo pacman -Syu
  Is easy
  No sketchy website like having to go to Firefox.com to download Firefox. Ughhh
  
  winget install firefox
  
  Whoosh?
  
  I maintain a bunch of PC's and 2 of them won't update anymore with some vague error code that only has a microsoft community forum post as search result. I'll get it fixed, but Windows update is not quite flawless and a non tech person would be lost at this point.
  People seem to be having a hard time grasping that most of the time it works great on both Windows and Linux. Majority of people will have a solid experience. But on both platforms, when things go to shit, you need to get your hands dirty. And with that final thought, I like to add that because of it's openness, is usually easier to troubleshoot an issue on Linux because it doesn't obscure what it's doing unlike Windows ("Please wait...", "Setting things up", ... dafuq u doin, it says 100%, is it doing anything still or is it hanging?). Windows' vagueness has been a pet peeve of mine and it's only getting worse. I'm perfectly ok shielding it by default, but give me a verbose option.

262 评论