> Vodafone and Three have rejected claims by the UK's competition watchdog that their proposed merger would lead to higher prices for millions of mobile users. > >The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has "provisionally concluded" the deal would weaken competition between mobile networks. > >It has particular concerns that customers who are least able to afford mobile services would be most affected. > >The findings are the latest from the CMA's ongoing probe into the merger, which it launched in January. > >The regulator will now consult on its findings and potential solutions to its worries over competition. > >These solutions could include legally binding investment commitments, and measures to protect both retail and wholesale customers. > >Vodafone's CEO for European Markets, Ahmed Essam, told the Today programme, on BBC Radio 4, that he still believed the merger would make a better network for customers, and add to the competition in the market. > >"We've made a significant commitment to an £11bn investment," he said. > >"We're willing to make sure that this is legally binding, and we undertake a commitment to deploy this." > >He also said the firm had already traded part of its radio spectrum with a competitor. > >But the CMA said it is "not convinced" that it would be good for consumers. > >"The main knockback to the merging parties is that the CMA considers claims of superior network quality post integration to be "overstated"," said Kester Mann from analysis firm CCS Insight. > >But he said the regulator was not shutting the door on the deal. > >"Vodafone and Three should be encouraged by the tone of the CMA's report, which appears more open to the merger than I was expecting." > >But Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at consumer group Which?, took a different view. > >"The regulator's finding has set a high bar for the merger to proceed," she said. > >"It is clear from those findings that the planned merger between Vodafone and Three could have a negative impact on millions of consumers." > >But she warned it would be "challenging" for the regulator to find remedies for its concerns.

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/17063929

> > A total of nine offshore wind farm contracts have been awarded by the government after last year's auction failed to attract any bidders at all. > > > >The contracts are part of a wider slate of green energy projects that also include tidal and solar power, and will provide enough electricity to fuel the equivalent of 11 million UK homes, the government said. > > > >However, while the new offshore wind projects have been broadly welcomed, some experts questioned whether they would generate enough capacity to meet renewable energy targets set for 2030. > > > > ... > > > > On Tuesday, a total of 131 contracts have been awarded to firms for projects which will generate 9.6 gigawatts (GWs) of renewable energy. > > > >The new offshore projects include what will be Europe's largest and second-largest wind farms, Hornsea 3 and Hornsea 4, which will be built off the Yorkshire coast by Ørsted, the Danish energy giant that is majority-owned by the state. > > > > The Labour government is aiming to produce 60GW of energy through offshore wind farms by 2030. > > > >The offshore wind farm projects announced on Tuesday provide capacity of 4.9GW. > > > >Pranav Menon, a research associate at Aurora Energy Research, said the government still has some way to go to meet its goal. > > > >"It still falls short of the pace required to meet its ambitious targets," he said.

Despite the name of the Staffordshire & Worcestershire canal, it doesn't actually go through the county town of Stafford so a group of volunteers are now trying to make that happen.

A new project has been launched in 2024 that will see a missing link in the canal & waterway network between Milton Keynes and Bedford finally connected.

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/15726788

> > Tucked away beyond the industrial landscapes of north-east Derbyshire and the M1 corridor, the Amber Valley is an oasis of greenery: ancient trees, listed buildings and public footpaths that are increasingly popular with tourists. > > > >But Katie Hirst, a local resident, fears that appreciative visitors will vanish along with the unspoilt landscape if a route of 50-metre-high pylons is brought down the valley as National Grid intends. > > > > “People come here for wonderful walks and the unspoilt landscape, and that would be gone, and the economy would really suffer,” said Hirst, a co-founder of Save Amber Valley Environment (Save), one of a growing number of grassroots groups opposed to pylon schemes across the country. > > > > ... > > > > More than 600,000km of power lines will have to be unrolled across the UK over the next few years for the country to properly decarbonise. But the pylons and the renewable infrastructure that will carry them are already causing anxiety and resistance. > > > > There were forceful statements from Keir Starmer last week, saying he would take the “tough decisions” necessary to get pylons built. The next day Ed Miliband was a little more emollient, promising to consider benefits for communities affected by the construction of renewable energy infrastructure, and community ownership of the assets, which could include onshore windfarms and solar farms. > > > >So how is this going to work? For the government to meet the ambitious target of decarbonising electricity generation by 2030, new infrastructure – including wind turbines, on and offshore; solar farms; and new transmission systems such as pylons – will be essential. > > > >But the other parliamentary parties either oppose pylons, or allow MPs in certain constituencies to oppose them. Local groups in some areas are also organising. > > > > ... > > > > The Labour party says it can meet its ambition of being a “clean energy superpower” only by building the new infrastructure necessary. The decarbonising electricity target is likely to require a doubling of onshore wind capacity, a quadrupling of offshore wind and a tripling of solar power by 2030. This will require what transmission companies have described as a “colossal” investment in power grid upgrades, which will cost billions of pounds and is likely to make the country’s electricity infrastructure more visible than ever before. > > > > The UK will need to install five times as many pylons and underground lines in the six years to 2030 as it has in the past 30 years – and four times more undersea cables than there are now, according to estimates from National Grid. Existing pylons and ageing cables will also need to be replaced. More than 600,000km of lines will need to be added or replaced by 2040 based on the age of existing transmission and distribution lines, the rollout of renewables and growing electricity demand, according to data from the International Energy Agency. This means cables will need to be rolled out at a pace of almost 100km every day for 17 years.

> It is now even harder and more expensive for the UK's biggest water provider to borrow money as leading credit ratings agency Moody's has downgraded its debt to "junk" status. > >Thames Water's parent company had already defaulted on some loan payments that make up its £16.5bn debt pile. More pressure will be put on its ability to meet debt obligations as a result of the downgrade. > >The utility is in a perilous financial position, due to run out of money next May as it cannot raise any investment from current shareholders who described the company as "uninvestable". > > Water regulator Ofwat requires utilities to maintain an "investment grade" debt ranking, something Thames Water no longer has.