whogivesashit @ whogivesashit @lemmygrad.ml

Posts

2

Comments

162

Joined

2 yr. ago

Enforcement agencies, vague talk about legalization, makes more sense, now we're getting somewhere. Hope you're able to find your way to a better career path. Lots of people partake in activities that others don't approve of. I don't think that means we should enforce our will on others. I personally think Christianity is a cult that primarily recruits through the indoctrination of children, but I'm also a fan of religious freedom. Condolences on your loss.

Ok fair point. Though I'll say in my experience I don't see people being weird out by 33/40 or even 33/51 in most cases. It's almost always with someone in their early 20s and it comes off weird when you know that the brain isn't even finished developing until years later. I think once someone reaches around 25-30 then they are truly considered "adult" in a more broad social sense.

Common complaint from people is that we send "kids" to war, but obviously most don't. We just know that's it's fucked up to make young people 18- early 20s make life altering decisions.

You ever read Fahrenheit 451? It's just a decent read imo, but it has a few gems worth mentioning. In case you're unfamiliar, it follows the story of a man (named Guy) who lives in a future version of America where books have been outlawed.

Guy meets a former English professor and begins to read in secret. In one of their meetings, the English professor tries to get Guy to talk about what he's thinking, but Guy is being timid in sharing his thoughts. The professor then says this

You're afraid of making mistakes. Don't be. Mistakes can be profited by. Man, when I was young I shoved my ignorance in people's faces. They beat me with sticks. By the time I was forty my blunt instrument had been honed to a fine cutting point for me. If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you'll never learn.

To hide your ideas this way is to live in a bubble, and you cannot grow your mind this way.

He is right, but I'm not gonna lie that hurted me a little from all the way over here.

I've seen like 5 comments where you refuse to expand on your views. This is a formal invitation to bring your opinion to the marketplace of ideas and have it sorted out.

Nah, you're just dumb as fuck actually

Also anyone dating legal teenagers as an adult are weird AF. Gives off "Id go lower but the law won't let me"

13/13 is fine. It is definitely about the gap wtf?

Literally. Outside of trusted circles you know what to expect from most of society

Marginalized groups tend to be the loudest about oppression of all varieties.

IMHO both groups have bad apples

Oh bad people can come from anywhere, what a salient observation.

By every important measurable standard, women are still treated worse in contemporary society. The fact you would respond with this nothing take when someone brings up misogyny is incredibly telling. Wishing well to any women unlucky enough to be in your life.

Politically, I'm a social conservative and a (non-chauvanist) cultural nationalist. Economically I don't really know what to support, as I haven't read a lot on the topic.

Lmao this literal dip shit of a child. I can't imagine having been this stupid at 16.

Tf. Plenty of anti communist action to do in the military now. Why isn't she serving?

Bunch of useless legal jargon to explain an incredibly simple point in usual debate bro style.

They are beefing with Noah saying that the ICJ ruled that Israel is plausibly commiting a genocide. Technically the ICJ didn't rule on that, they just ruled that provisional measures are needed because there's clearly some genocidal maniacs around.

The irony is OP clearly doesn't understand the ruling, as you can see in the comment chain that has this relevant snippet from the ICJ:

62 - The Court is not called upon, for the purposes of its decision on the request for the indication of provisional measures, to establish the existence of breaches of obligations under the Genocide Convention, but to determine whether the circumstances require the indication of provisional measures for the protection of rights under that instrument. As already noted, the Court cannot at this stage make definitive findings of fact (see paragraph 30 above), and the right of each Party to submit arguments in respect of the merits remains unaffected by the Court’s decision on the request for the indication of provisional measures.

Yes. Only get your info from approved sources people. Heaven forbid you fact check anything yourselves

Humans have no issue with identifying cause and effect in everything but their own heads. To believe we are immune or that it is "unknown" is akin to believing in the soul imo. We aren't special. Just another part of the universe.

Believing that the Nazis, who systematically gassed millions as a part of their ideology, is at all akin to any of the atrocities committed under the Soviet Union is historical revisionism in order to downplay the crimes of the fascists and, what you can clearly see in this thread already, foster anti communist sentiment with barely a reason why.

We're all poor af

Ikr. I didn't believe it and immediately checked the post history. It's very obviously a Republican being sarcastic