![User banner](https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/headers/110/893/325/969/781/371/original/b3c36f890d415c3b.png)
@const_void It's not about choosing distros in anyway, please read the post before you comment. ๐
@CrabAndBroom Thank you, but I already covered this ๐ When you check my profile, you will see thats exactly the stuff I'm dealing with day by day, but ty! I may will take a look at OpenSnitch, but I think Portmaster is already covering this need.
@beta_tester Could you tell me more abt Distrobox and SElinux? I think I never heard of both before
@Corb_The_Lesser @linux Oh. Thank you a lot! Never discovered this lol
@keydelk @linux Hm, ig I will stick to Cinnamon, I don't want to run into issues, using another environment which got discontinued by Linux Mint a few years before for some reasons.
Abt the browser and content blocking, is already done ;) Privacy and Security is one of the things I'm very good at, just wanted to know how to enchance the security of Linux Mint.
Btw. I would recommend uBlock Origin instead of ADP is leightweighter, customizable, opensource, non-commercial and pretty well. Since ADP had some controversies in the past.
I'm pretty happy with Linux Mint so far, never tried Fedora, but I will take a look on it
If you use touchpad gestures, the new configuration options are useful.
Where can I find them?
@MuffinJets @linux Oh sorry, forgot to mention it, I'm using Cinnamon since I liked it the most
Hey ๐ dear Linux Community,
I'm still kinda new to Linux (started using this year ๐ ) I already made it to my main OS, even if I still missing some things which I used on Windows, anyway. What I wanted to ask you guys, what recommendations do you have for Linux Mint (Cinnamon)? In terms of security, optimization, (a way to make the UI looking modern ;-;) and privacy? I would be very interested in what you do guys to optimize your Linux setup :) I'm pretty technical, so there is nothing which could overwhelm me (probaly).
Thx! ๐ค
\#privacy #dataprotection #linux #linuxmint #opensource #foss #cybersecurity @linux
@GentriFriedRice There are multiply dectections and like mentioned in another comment there was multiply reports from Edge and Firefox users that they experienced the same issue.
@Bear_with_a_hammer Ah alright, goos to know. Do you have a link to it?
@programmer_belch Not sure since I'm not so good at javascript, but I know abt several reports and articles that Edge users has the same issue as Firefox users.
@SaltyIceteaMaker Same, I think it's bc of uBO or other modifications from or which I made to LibreWolf, but other people made reports on Reddit and other Social Media platforms that they expierenced that and the code obviously shows that YT is doing that stuff.
@Asudox Firefox and Edge are two of the biggest competitors to Chrome, Edge is like a degoogled version of Chromium but with a bunch of Microsoft Trash instead, they don't even have Google Safebrowsing or Google as default search engine like Firefox does.
![](https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/111/465/537/377/547/676/original/f12bd44c1339a23a.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
\#YouTube is making the watching experience worse on #Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
I didn't believe it the first time I heard abt it, since it sounded more like a conspiracy theory than a actual thing, but it's true. Google does add 5s timeout specifically to Firefox and Edge users when they try to watch a video on YT. If you want to know more about it, Mental Outlaw make a very good video abt it (Link: https://youtu.be/v4gXhmzQztE ). I think Google did this, to get people moving to Chrome since the majority will think this is a browser issue, nobody would expect YouTube to purposely doing this. In the attached Screenshot you can see that YouTube checks the user agent of browsers to see if it's Edge, Firefox or not. You can bypass this by changing your User agent to chrome.
Edit: Due a lot of people saying a lot of different things abt it, I want to say that I'm not 100% sure abt how exactly this works, there is a inbuild delay by Google, but who is actually affected, there are a lot of different opinions abt it. I wasn't able to verify this myself in LibreWolf, but this could be the case due my intensive hardening I did and this is just a result of what I found in the code and what Mental Outlaw and others shared across social media, if you got different or additional infos abt this feel free to comment and I suggest everyone ti also check the comment section.
\#privacy #youtube #google #dataprotection #firefox #msedge #browser @privacy
@whale For me it works ๐คทโโ๏ธ
(tested with hardened Brave and Mull (hardened Firefox for Android Fork))
@sj_zero Just wanted to share this information, is not a recommendation which search engine you should use. Not everyone feel comfortable with using a search engine which is closed source and owned by a company, some rather wanna use a opensource search engine hosted by a invidual or a group of people, some other people prefer search engines like DuckDuckGo since they work put of the box without problems and have usually a better usability for the modt people, then SearX (or SearXNG) does.
Did you know..?
DuckDuckGo has two non-javascript versions of their search engine and both of them are very lightweight, especially the lite version.
You can access them via:
Html: https://html.duckduckgo.com/html
Good news! Brave for Android now let's u use your favorite uBlock Origin Blocklists!
Under Settings \> Brave Shields & privacy
Can you now add custom filterlists and edit Brave's default selection of the already avaible filterlists. Some of you now that this was possible before too (via brave://adblock) but at this time it had no UI and wasn't a official feature, now you can easily add, remove and customize fiterlists via the the settings.
@IronKrill Thats the same thing I think abt you guys, but alright.
@eya May I ask why you think that? I their afe good reasons to don't use Firefox either...
@themoonisacheese If you think so ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Warning to all Brave Browser Users
Blocking variations.brave.com which is used for A/B testing could potentially break Brave's functionalities. For me did Brave's "forgetful browsing" feature broke which seems to be disabled by default if you block this domain.
Say (an encrypted) hello to a more private internet.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/encrypted-hello/
Nothing big, but kinda interesting. I'm excited to see how this will go ๐
@free Yep, thats why people invest a lot of time which have much more technical understanding than you have to create products to improve the privacy problem on Windows, Privacy isn't a privilege which only a specific group of human is allowed to have, Privacy is a human right and should be accessable for everyone. If you miss the understanding for that, I would recommend informing yourself better then spreading false information.
Tor Browser is no longer flagged as "Malware" by Windows Defender
https://forum.torproject.org/t/torbrowser-12-5-6-no-longer-flagged-by-windows-defender/9522
\#privacy #cybersecurity #torbrowser #thetorproject @privacy
@mintycactus So thanks for writing your thoughs down, before I just write a whole text about with what I agree, I just say I agree with the most things you said, but there are just few things I see a bit different or disgagree with:
-"it is both Google and not-Google"
I have to disgagree with that one, Brave is less Google then default firefox, in fact Brave removes a lot of the trash chromium stuff which Google implemented (they made a article with on github abt it) and make zero connections to Google domains, not even Google safebrowsing.
-"I think it dies fast and I am OK if it just dies"
I totally disagree with that, I don't use Firefox as my main browser, but I like it and also the Firefox Forks which exist like LibreWolf and Waterfox, we definitly need competition in the browser scene and Firefox does a pretty good job so far, just with few major things they are killing themselve which isn't good..
-"Absolutely bad for web apps (no icons, no PiP)"
It's "okay" on Windows, idk how it is on Linux, never tried
-"Firefox color tabs ROCKS, Brave profiles is a shadow alternative."
I think this is personally preference, I actually like Brave profiles more since they fit much better into my workflow, but I would love to have smth like Firefox's isolated tabs feature on Brave. Firefox has also profiles like Chromium, is just hidden in the "about:profiles" tab which is sad, bc I think there are few people out there who actually would love to use this.
-"I love Firefox community and I hate Brave community"
I don't like both very much, except few inviduals.
-"Letโs start with Brave, they are super greedy and stupid"
Not they from the privacy community, but many of them in general, yea.
-"Firefox community is OK, until things are about alternatives, they isolate themselves into a bubble and are fine with this chamber"
The Firefox community is very toxic, if you have a different opinion as them, when you start critizing Mozilla for some bad things they have done or mention that you use Brave as ur Main Browser they start harrassing you. Some of them are also toxic over people who use forks like LibreWolf or Waterfox.
Little Rat - a browser extension for monitoring other extensions
"Little Rat is an open-source extension designed for network traffic monitoring. Easily view, monitor, and block traffic from other Chrome extensions on a per-extension basis."
I use it myself and I think it's a very useful extension for everyone who uses more than just few extensions for different purposes and don't fully trust them that they send no data as the developer promises, this extension can monitor the network and act as a firewall per-extension basis.
Download (Lite Version | Can't monitor requests, only block): https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/little-rat/oiopkpalpilladnibecobcecijffaflf
Source Code and full version (recommended): https://github.com/dnakov/little-rat/
(I'm not affliate with the developer in any way and just wanted to share this)
\#privacy #browser #chromium #browserextensions @privacyguides @privacy
Brave on Linux, different?
Am I the only who thinks that @brave feels different on Linux than on Windows? Not only that some icons look different and that some defaults have different settings, why is "Forgetful Browsing" disabled in the flags (brave://flags), while it's already released on Windows and Android? I checked if I'm maybe using a older version, but nope. I use the same version of Brave as on Windows.
So, I'm interested how the implementation of "Perfect Forward Secrecy" in Signal looks like, like does every messages has a different encryption key? or does it change over time like #whatsapp does? I tried to find any official documention of this, sadly did not find anything.
Thats why I'm asking, does anyone of you know smth about this and maybe can provide a link to a official source?
\#signal #signalapp #privacy #encryption @signalapp @SignalUpdateInfo @privacy
Bounce Tracking
I heard of this methode of Tracking before, but never knew that this was it's name, anyway. As I searched for it, I found this article from Brave which gives a very easy to understand explanation of Bounce Tracking, I recommend reading it.
\#privacy #brave #browser #tracking @privacy https://brave.com/glossary/bounce-tracking/
![voxel](https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/110/893/325/969/781/371/original/f72d069394bf74ec.png?format=webp&thumbnail=64)
A #privacy ๐ถ๏ธ and #cybersecurity ๐ก๏ธ focused Voxel :p You can find here all kinds of posts related to these topics ๐ You will sometimes also find post about my opinions, thoughs or other tech related stuff. :D
If you wanna get in contact with me, just ask, I'm open for meeting new people ๐ค
Reposts doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, sometimes I just want to show it to you.
โ ๏ธ No enter for threads.net users! โ ๏ธ