thedruid @ thedruid @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 312Joined 2 mo. ago
So, let me take a moment to be sure I don't overstate what I'm about to say
Trump is a soulless fat frog who may in fact be satan himself. Every thought, every impulse, ever plan he has is unconstitutional, evil and indiscriminate.
Jail. For life. That where he will be
Did you go to trump university? You responded to MY comments which were clear.
Stop moving goal posts ,making assumptions, and resorting to name-calling g it's a sign of stupidity, that I am not ready to truly apply to you, yet
Now. Good evening.
Yep. That's is exactly correct.
No. You're mad at someone who isn't buying that a. I. 's are anything but a cool parlor trick that isn't ready for prime time
Because that's all I'm saying. The are wrong more often than right. They do not complete tasks given to them and they really are garbage
Now this is all regarding the publicly available a. Is. What ever new secret voodoo one. Think has or military has, I can't speak to.
That's not the task I mentioned.
I asked what the difference between two modes is. It was wrong. It was confidently wrong.
I
So we have a guy who may do the right thing. Let's see what he REALLY DOES.
I'll step back and give him a chance, but for me, the jury is put
I don't know any soldiers who have told me that. Not saying you're wrong, just saying that's new info to me.
Oh for sure. Just giving a bit of info
No. Just ignore him
I know. it would be a lot better world if a. I apologists could just admit they are wrong
But nah. They better than others.
No. It gave the wrong answer therefore it didn't complete the task. It gave the wrong answer. Task incomplete
That's literally how a task works.
You're just as bad.
Let's focus on a spell check issue.
That's why we have trump
No, the task was To tell me the difference in the two modes.
It provided incorrect information and passed it off as accurate. It didn't complete the task
You know that though. You're just too invested to admit it. So I will withdraw. Enjoy your day.
That's a huge, arrogant and quite insulting statement. Your making assumptions based on stereotypes
Not relevant to the conversation.
And anyone who understands marketing knows it's all a smokescreen to hide the fact that we have released unreliable, unsafe and ethicaly flawed products on the human race because , mah tech.
That's not completing a task. That's faking a result for appearance.
Is that what you're advocating for ?
If I ask an llm to tell me the difference between aeolian mode and Dorian mode in the field of music , and it gives me the wrong info, then no it's not working as intended
See I chose that example because I know the answer. The llm didn't. But it gave me an answer. An incorrect one
I want you to understand this. You're fighting the wrong battle. The llms do make mistakes. Frequently. So frequently that any human who made the same amount of mistakes wouldn't keep their job.
But the investment, the belief in a.i is so engrained for some of us who so want a bright and technically advanced future, that you are now making excuses for it. I get it. I'm not insulting you. We are humans. We do that. There are subjects I am sure you could point at where I do this as well
But a.i.? No. It's just wrong so often. It's not it's fault. Who knew that when we tried to jump ahead in the tech timeline, that we should have actually invented guardrail tech first?
Instead we let the cart go before the horses, AGAIN, because we are dumb creatures , and now people are trying to force things that don't work correctly to somehow be shown to be correct.
I know. A mouthful. But honestly. A.i. is poorly designed, poorly executed, and poorly used.
It is hastening the end of man. Because those who have been singing it's praises are too invested to admit it.
It simply ain't ready.
Edit: changed "would" to "wouldn't"
Until we totally overhaul officer training and suitability, nothing will change. The gangs are in uniform
You may be accurate, but that doesn't mean you're not also being a bit of anjerk