sevenapples @ sevenapples @lemmygrad.ml

Posts

3

Comments

282

Joined

2 yr. ago

I only glossed over the video because it was hard to watch, but at some point he mentions having a video on his phone where he urges Hamas to release the hostages. So I assume he was naive enough to think that the media would report this on their own

Don't want to doom too much but it certainly feels like this. Iran could get coopted or fall back to its previous diplomatic tactics of trying to play both sides (and not aligning further with China). Meanwhile the US could stop aiding Ukraine in exchange with Russia not aligning further with China/NK. And of course if Iran fails then no one will be able to stop the genocide in Palestine.

One big beautiful missile

timestamp please, every cut video on youtube is the clip about Iran's population

So, what did Iran do that we will remember for centuries? It must be close to 24 hours since that statement.

If the US gets involved doesn't Iran need to sink the aircraft carrier? Otherwise at some point their AD will get overwhelmed or depleted.

That's true. I just hope that the climax comes while there are Palestinians remaining, and of course with the resistance's win

I want the decades where nothing happens back

I seriously hope people talking about US/Israel going nuclear are only dooming. I can't even begin to fathom the outcome...

that's one way to learn that H is silent in Italian, lmao

we are rescuing people by bringing them to an active war zone

Their whole PR shtick is saving "the west" from Iran (which they describe as a rogue regime) acquiring nukes. Using nukes offensively would wake the fuck up even the most brainwashed liberals, right? RIGHT?

I can't tell if this is satire or not

That makes sense if they intend to fire them as retaliatiory strikes. I thought they would use them regardless

Eh, reservists don't matter when one side is bombing with aircraft and the other with missiles. But more population can equal more production which could be definitive if the war drags out

I'm no military expert but announcing your move beforehand does not seem smart.

no phones in sight, just people living in the moment.

Even if you can intercept the bulk (or even more), it makes sense to minimize your losses from whatever comes through, whether that's 90%, 50% or 10% of the original attack.

The american urge to unleash nuclear armageddon

There's no inherent difference. It's people mistakenly generalizing after hating on current image and text generation AI models. And there's obviously a discussion to be made about how these models were trained unethically by stealing data, but a) that is irrelevant to their usefulness as a technology b) it was recently shown that you can train them with purely public domain data with good results (yogthos posted an article from Stanford the other day).

GenAI is not (inherently) a grift, unless you believe the following applications are nothing but grifts:

• machine translation
• image upscaling/restoration/coloring
• support chatbots
• etc