Remember_the_tooth @ Remember_the_tooth @lemmy.world Posts 101Comments 1,505Joined 3 mo. ago
That was a way more thorough response than I was expecting.
Also, "zoysia" is a name I haven't heard in a long time. How do you keep it under control?
And not a dance like the noble bee?
You're not wrong. One group will displace the other, though. Some of us Homo Sapiens still have genes from Homo Neanderthalensis. Neanderthals aren't around anymore, though. Also, archeological evidence suggests they didn't spend much time together.
Ugh. Now I'm going to have to break out the concordance and lexicons to sort through this issue. Thanks for your thoughtful and informed opinion.
Respectfully, I must disagree. I recommend Poa pratensis, but I admit that this varies based on the USDA plant hardiness zone.
I meant, can't we just be more specific rather than use paraphyletic grouping?
"What's for dinner?"
"Fish"
"That could mean anything!"
"You know I meant Actinopterygii."
"Still pretty broad."
"Oncorhynchus."
"You know how I feel about trout."
"Ugh. tshawytscha."
"Well, why didn't you just say so in the first place?"
Thanks!
Also, I recognize your username. I feel like you may have encountered my ignorance on at least one previous occasion.
Can't we just un-fish it like we do for other clades when we need to?
"There's an ape in the office!"
"Yes, his name is Tom. More importantly, he is a human being, and we don't refer to them as apes outside of an academic context and even then, only when necessary."
[Tom eats a banana, screams at an intern, and starts picking his nose]
Wow, that's a lot better than my comment. Sorry I whiffed it.
I don't want to criticize internet absurdity for many reasons, including but not limited to the fact that I depend on it to survive. Having said that, what's the application of a length to area ratio?
I'm ecstatic to hear that! I will give you eleventy billion imaginary Tooth points if you can find a source.
Okay, first of all, how dare you bring evidence and reason into this.
On a more serious note, I agree with the position mentioned in the second paragraph that transhumanism results in a posthuman being, that is, a species that is not human.
Just say anything because doing so proves you have lungs to power your larynx.
Interesting hypothesis. I guess the best way to test it would be to try to sell bee safety glasses to beekeepers.
You're right. They're different.
Agreed. I was referring to book lungs.
Also, I feel like you got some 'splainin' to do regarding the fish reference.
I want to hear more about biblical teleportation. I definitely missed that in Sunday school.