Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PL
Posts
0
Comments
238
Joined
4 wk. ago

  • Ich glaube die USA werden China angreifen und Europa wird russische Kräfte binden, damit sie China nicht unterstützen können.

    Wenn Russland gegen die Ukraine Probleme hat trotz deutlichem Vorteil in der Luft, wie sollen sie dann einen konventionellen Krieg gegen Europa führen? Wir brauchen die Waffen nicht als Abschreckung gegen Russland. Damit muss es einen anderen Grund geben, und da fällt mir nur China ein.

  • In der Hälfte aller deutschen Kreise und kreisfreien Städte findet KI am Jobmarkt demnach so gut wie gar nicht statt.

    Der Standort der Firma ist doch zweitrangig. Die meisten KI Arbeitsplätze sollten Remote Arbeitsplätze sein.

  • Like the other comment says, it must be the New START treaty, but I am no expert. It seems like it's a Russian excuse for their carelessness however some parts of the treaty were respected so I think Putin and Trump had some topics to clarify.

    On 21 February 2023, Russia suspended its participation in New START.[8] However, it did not withdraw from the treaty, and clarified that it would continue to abide by the numerical limits in the treaty.

    On 2 June 2024, the United States revoked visas of Russian nuclear inspectors, describing this step as a "lawful countermeasure" to Russia's "ongoing violations" of the treaty.

    So some parts of the treaty must have been considered active.

    On 1 June 2025, Ukraine claimed to have destroyed more than a dozen nuclear strategic bombers, including two Tu-160, at airfields deep inside Russia with swarms of small drones. The bombers were still parked not in nuclear strike protective bunkers, but in open-air, according to obligations under the New START Treaty with the US.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START

  • I think it could help to approach the game differently.

    There is the anecdote about chess in which two kings are about to lead their armies into battle, but they play a game of chess first and start to appreciate their opponent and end up not fighting the battle.

    There is the entire history of colonialism that suggests otherwise, but I think that capitalism is more than a means to oppress the masses. The masses are oppressed to achieve cultural progress. There is no need for our current form of capitalism if we find a way to create progress in another way.

    State capitalism was not bad, but I think it is a dead end. We should try to come up with, and try other ways.

  • Das dürfte sich auf das Gespräch von Weidel mit Musk beziehen, wo Weidel erklärt hat, dass die AfD wegen ihrer (neoliberalen) Wirtschaftspolitik keine Nazis sein können.

    Der Teil wurde gar nicht genug genutzt, denn Neoliberal können AfD Wähler eigentlich nicht wollen.

  • if it were the same, you wouldn’t have been allowed to make this comment.

    It works both ways. Is OP allowed to make the comment because he is more priviliged or because he has less power and is less of a threat?

    Remember the McCarthy era. There can be more restrictions if needed.