That timeline is horrifying, as is their LinkedIn feed. They seem to position themselves as a private militia for corporate interests. If the Canadian government had any spine whatsoever they would seize all of their assets immediately.
This theory is only falsifiable if Carney breaks an explicit promise he made during the election.
If supply management isn't dropped (by the way, Trump is already going after it, now that Carney caved on the DST) then you'll want to claim that this theory of yours was correct - but in reality, Carney's pathetic capitulation on the DST likely has absolutely nothing to do with keeping supply management.
Regardless, if Carney doesn't break this unambiguous election promise, that's not a cause for celebration or congratulations. He could've passed a bill to protect supply management - was asked directly to do so - and he intentionally didn't do it.
It's almost as if he wants to be strong-armed into giving it away. And boy oh boy I can't wait to hear from his sycophantic fans why it was actually a genius move to get rid of supply management, once it's gone.
This theory runs into some trouble when you realize the Liberals chose to campaign just as hard in NDP strongholds as they did in Conservative ridings. I will never advocate for "strategic" voting again after that.
That timeline is horrifying, as is their LinkedIn feed. They seem to position themselves as a private militia for corporate interests. If the Canadian government had any spine whatsoever they would seize all of their assets immediately.