Max @ maxwellfire @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

142

Joined

2 yr. ago

This is what I've been going through, sold as teaching rust to people who already know other languages. I'm not very far in at all, but it seems decent? https://google.github.io/comprehensive-rust/

It's a pet peeve of mine when reporters phrase things like this. I assume this means that < 50% of democrats want to move toward the middle and that >50% of Republicans are unhappy with their party (and thus want it to move somewhere?). If that's the case then wouldn't it imply that republicans are actually more unhappy with their party's position than democrats are? Or it would if the things they were discussing were comparable. Wanting to move right probably isn't the same stat as 'happy with their party'

Less than of 7 in 8 democrats reported liking facts, while more than 20% of republicans love them!

The important thing is that the game itself uses vulkan. I believe that's entirely independent of whether your window manager uses vulkan. If your games work, then they're probably using vulkan. They won't work any better if sway does as well.

What's also funny is that there is a person asking exactly the same question in the screenshot that you shared

This means that there's an update. If you go to the play store and install updates then restart the app it will go away. There seems to be a bug in voyager where it disables the update menu but not the red bubble if installed from the play store (instead of as a PWA)

It looks like this was testing in tension? I image most of the improvements would happen in shear. Since that's where you make the crack more tortuous. In tension the increase in contact is very slight.

I think the idea is that the larger society/city/culture is addicted, not the individual people

This is the number of times you have upvoted that account

This is a really fantastic explanation of the issue!

It's more like improv comedy with an extremely adaptable comic than a conversation with a real person.

One of the things that I've noticed is that the training/finetuning that's done in order to make it give good completions to the "helpful ai conversation scenario" is that it flattens a lot of the capabilities of the underlying language model for really interesting and specific completions. I remember playing around with gpt2 in it's native text completion mode, and even with that much weaker model, it was able to complete a much larger variety of text styles without sliding into the sameness and slickness of the current chat model fine-tuning.

A lot of the research that I read on LLMs is using them in the original token completion context, but pretty much the only way people interact with them is through a thick layer of ai chatbot improv. As an example for code, I imagine that one would have more success using an LLM to edit your code if the context that you give it starts out written like it is a review of a pull request for the code, or some other commentary of a form that matches the way that code is reviewed in the training data. But instead of having access to create that context directly, we have to ask for code review through the fogged window of a chat between an AI assistant and a person discussing code. And that form of chat likely isn't well represented in the training data.

I think we may have different definitions of a kettle. I mean something like this:

Which you put on the stove. I can't imagine that having tea in this is a problem at all. It's just glass.

I've also done this with something like:

Which I could imagine keeping more of the taste/being a problem.

I assume you mean something like this by a kettle?:

Apparently I'm committing all the tea sins. I definitely make tea in a kettle. But if I do that, I boil the water before adding the tea bags. Isn't that pretty standard? I'd only do so if I'm making a lot of the same tea (or iced tea), usually for a group of people

I often do this. With loose leaf tea too. The quality of the result highly depends on the tea and whether you get the timing right. I know my microwave pretty well and can hit boiling or just before boiling by changing the time for a black vs a green tea.

When boiled appropriately, I can't really tell the difference for most bagged teas, so maybe I'm just tea uncultured?

The earl grey loose leaf I have I actually like better when it's kept boiling for longer (about 15 seconds of boiling), and the microwave allows me to easily do this.

The loose green tea I have changes its flavor a lot when heated for different amounts and to different temperatures. The microwave also let's me easily control this in a way that I would struggle to with a kettle. I suppose I could add the tea afterwards and just get the water a bit hotter to compensate, but I'm lazy and I always forget about my tea in the microwave so it's easier if it already has the leaves in it so I don't have to re-steep

It definitely depends on the microwave. In my office, one boils a mug in 2:20, while the other requires over 3 min

This is definitely not possible with base KDE. If you're using x11, you might be able to follow https://askubuntu.com/questions/1398508/split-a-widescreen-monitor-in-two but it's pretty fragile, and I'm not sure if KDE will respect those monitors.

And if you can't afford the post your-fault car insurance you don't get to drive a car, so if you can't afford the post your-fault health insurance you don't get to live?

Cranberry Sauce with Zinfandel & Spices

sauces Difficulty: Easy

Ingredients:

1-¾ cups red Zinfandel 1 cup sugar 1 cup (packed) golden brown sugar 6 whole cloves (look up conversion to ground) 6 whole allspice (look up conversion to ground) 2 cinnamon sticks

1. 3x1” strip of orange peel
2. 12oz bag of fresh cranberries

Directions:

Combine all ingredients except cranberries in medium saucepan. Bring to boil over medium-high heat, stirring until sugar dissolves. Reduce heat and simmer until reduced to 1-¾ cups, about 10 minutes. Strain syrup into large saucepan. Add cranberriees to syrup and cook over medium heat until berries burst, about 6 minutes. Cool. Transfer sauce to medium bowl. Cover and refriderate until cold. Can be made 1 week ahead. Keep refrigerated.

Source: Bon Appetit, November 2001

(My clipboard was actually empty, but this is the last text I shared on my phone)

How do you handle leftovers? Probably about 80% of the food I eat wasn't cooked on the day I eat it

What about solvespace web build: https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/tree/emscripten#building-for-web

I don't know a lot about tailscale, but I think that's likely not relevant to what's possible (but maybe relevant to how to accomplish it).

It sounds like the main issue here is dns. If you wanted to/were okay with just IP based connections, then you could assign each service to a different port on Bob's box, and then have nginx point those ports at the relevant services. This should be very easy to do with a raw nginx config. I could write one for you if you wanted. It's pretty easy if you're not dealing with https/certificates (in which case this method won't work anyway).

Looking quickly on google for npm (which I've never used), this might require adding the ports to the docker config and then using that port in npn (Like here). This is likely the simplest solution.

If you want hostnames/https, then you need some sort of DNS. This is a bit harder. You can take over their router like you suggested. You could use public DNS that points at a private IP (this is the only way I'm suggesting to get public trusted ssl certificates).

You might be able to use mdns to get local DNS at Bob's house automatically, which would be very clean. You'd basically register like jellyseer.local and jellyfin.local on Bob's network from the box and then setup the proxy manager to proxy based on those domains. You might be able to just do avahi-publish -a -R jellyseer.local 192.168.box.ip and then avahi-publish -a -R jellyfin.local 192.168.box.ip. And then any client that supports mdns/avahi will be able to find the service at that host. You can then register those names nginx/npn and I think things should just work

To answer your questions directly

1. Yes I think just a box can work
2. I think locations are going to be a nightmare. don't use them if you can avoid it. Also plain nginx really isn't so bad, and you can learn pretty quickly. this is probably fine in npn though
3. I don't think you need to dive into iptables or anything like that. Iptables would provide a lower level proxying (level 3 instead of like level 7), which could be useful if you're running non http services, but isn't necessary for 99% of web stuff.
4. I think part of the problem might be working with higher level systems like npn, but a lot of it is just that networking involves so many layers and there are multiple solutions to any problem, all of which require knowing somewhat what's happening under the surface to understand why they're failing

I'd be happy to try and give more specifics if you choose a path similar to one of the above things.

I believe that the 67% number for the 2020 election is of eligible voters and not registered voters. While turnout is low, it's not 25% low.